Political conservatives operate out of a fear of chaos and absence of order while political liberals operate out of a fear of emptiness, a new Northwestern University study soon to be published in the Journal of Research in Personality finds.
“Social scientists long have assumed that liberals are more rational and less fearful than conservatives, but we find that both groups view the world as a dangerous place,” says Dan McAdams, study co-author and professor of human development and psychology at Northwestern University. “It’s just that their fears emerge differently.”
To better understand the differences between politically conservative Christian Americans and their liberal counterparts, McAdams and Northwestern University co-author Michelle Albaugh asked 128 socially active churchgoers this question: What if there were no God?
“Social scientists -- who are generally liberals -- have for decades done research to figure out what makes conservatives tick,” says McAdams. The study, “What if there Were No God? Politically Conservative and Liberal Christians Imagine their Lives without Faith,” now is available online to subscribers to the journal.
Like the Northwestern study, the preponderance of research finds that conservatives fear unchecked human impulses that challenge the status quo. What McAdams and Northwestern researcher Albaugh also find is an underlying, but different, fear that drives liberals as well.
“Political conservatives envision a world without God in which baser human impulses go unchecked, social institutions (marriage, government, family) fall apart and chaos ensues,” says McAdams. Liberals, on the other hand, envision a world without God as barren, lifeless, devoid of color and reasons to live.
“Liberals see their faith as something that fills them up and, without it, they conjure up metaphors of emptiness, depletion and scarcity,” McAdams said. “While conservatives worry about societal collapse, liberals worry about a world without deep feelings and intense experiences.”
The study findings may shed light on why conservatives prefer more authoritarian leaders while liberals do not, he adds.
“What’s clear is that it is their political and not religious orientation that underlies the different psychologies of political conservatives and liberals,” says McAdams. After all, all of the adults he and Northwestern researcher Albaugh studied were members of churches, and their data suggested that most were socially involved, altruistic people.
The Northwestern University study sample included 128 highly religious and politically active Americans who attend church regularly. Although nationally conservatives are more likely to attend church than liberals, the Northwestern study was set up to sample equally from religious conservatives and religious liberals.
The researchers also observed gender differences, but said they did not interfere with the relationship between political orientation and narrative themes. The study is part of a larger project that looks at the relationships of faith, politics and life stories in well-functioning American adults. It is funded by the Foley Family Foundation in Milwaukee.
Comments
Obvious fault here...
November 13, 2008 by Anonymous, 33 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32831
If this statement is to be accepted as true,
then the study would have to be designed such that religious as well as non-religious could participate. And I have to echo the concern that the sample size was so small. Was it all from one region? Was it conducted standing outside of a single church after the service let out?
Surely the study has more information but it is not evident by the content of the article.
RH
whatsah
September 25, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32127
Whats the Margin of Error on a stat regarding 400 million people when your selection size is 128 people? Or better yet how do you justify the results of your study when you dont even know what your Population Size is? Not all 400 million American falls into these two groups. I've met crack heads that make more sense then these college professors.
A meaningful difference
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32124
is the fact that conservatives vote and liberals do not. This coupled with conservative vote manipulation and liberal spinelessness to defeat same will lead to 16 years of Sarah Palin. Enjoy!
TS
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32123
Marx and Engels new that their belief system was based on a "void" and reached this conclusion 100 years ahead of McAdams. They identified the void as "alienation", not emptiness. Marxism was the proposed cure for alienation by putting everyone on a level economic playing field. Unfortunately, for Socialsm to work, it required a perfect self-sacrificing materiality rejecting human ... thus its utter failure as a solution.
Crazy Train
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32121
When the responses are more rational, scientific, and well spoken than the actual original Blog entry report you know you have a serious problem.
More Rational?
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32120
“Social scientists long have assumed that liberals are more rational and less fearful than conservatives, but we find that both groups view the world as a dangerous place,â€
If liberals are more rational, why is it an assumption? Isn't science about establishing whether assumptions are true or not? The fact that some social scientist and some liberals except the assumption as true without seeking to validate it shows that they are not very rational nor very scientific.
"Social scientists long have
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32119
"Social scientists long have assumed that liberals are more rational and less fearful than conservatives"
Didn't see anything in the article to disprove this.
By seeking out of the church-going liberals aren't you specifically sampling the least rational part of the group. The real finding is that religious people find the world a fearful place independently of politics.
Well put, anonymous.
September 24, 2008 by IdahoEv, 40 weeks 3 days ago
Comment id: 32118
Well put, anonymous. Conclusions are way too broadly applied, given the assumption and the test population.
Careful reasoning?
September 24, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 3 days ago
Comment id: 32114
Their experiment looks are whether rationality and fearfulness are correlated with political leaning only among those who are religious. They then acknowledge that liberals are less likely to be religious, and draw unsupported conclusions about the correlation of political leaning in general with rationality and fearfulness.
It must be nice to be a social scientist.
Post new comment