Skip to content

Waste from gut bacteria helps host control weight

A single molecule in the intestinal wall, activated by the waste products from gut bacteria, plays a large role in controlling whether the host animals are lean or fatty, a research team, including scientists from UT Southwestern Medical Center, has found in a mouse study.

When activated, the molecule slows the movement of food through the intestine, allowing the animal to absorb more nutrients and thus gain weight. Without this signal, the animals weigh less.

The study shows that the host can use bacterial byproducts not only as a source of nutrients, but also as chemical signals to regulate body functions. It also points the way to a potential method of controlling weight, the researchers said.

"It's quite possible that blocking this receptor molecule in the intestine might fight a certain kind of obesity by blocking absorption of energy from the gut," said Dr. Masashi Yanagisawa, professor of molecular genetics at UT Southwestern and a senior co-author of the study, which appears online in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Humans, like other animals, have a large and varied population of beneficial bacteria that live in the intestines. The bacteria break up large molecules that the host cannot digest. The host in turn absorbs many of the resulting small molecules for energy and nutrients.

"The number of bacteria in our gut far exceeds the total number of cells in our bodies," said Dr. Yanagisawa.

"It's truly a mutually beneficial relationship. We provide the bacteria with food, and in return they supply energy and nutrients," he explained.

Using mice, the researchers focused on two species of bacteria that break up dietary fibers from food into small molecules called short-chain fatty acids. Dr. Yanagisawa's team previously had found that short-chain fatty acids bind to and activate a receptor molecule in the gut wall called Gpr41, although little was known about the physiological outcome of Gpr41 activation.

The researchers disrupted communication between the bacteria and the hosts in two ways: raising normal mice under germ-free conditions so they lacked the bacteria, and genetically engineering other mice to lack Gpr41 so they were unable to respond to the bacteria.

In both cases, the mice weighed less and had a leaner build than their normal counterparts even though they all ate the same amount.

The researchers also found that in mice without Gpr41, the intestines passed food more quickly. They hypothesized that one action of Gpr41 is to slow down the motion that propels food forward, so that more nutrients can be absorbed. Thus, if the receptor cannot be activated, food is expelled more quickly, and the animal gets less energy from it.

Because mice totally lacking Gpr41 were still healthy and had intestinal function, the receptor may be a likely target for drugs that can slow, but not stop, energy intake, Dr. Yanagisawa said.

October 17, 2008

Comments

more on sources

October 18, 2008 by bazilio, 1 year 4 weeks ago
Comment id: 32459

Thanks for the reply, BJS.
Yes, I could easily dig out the original publication. But for me the major purpose of this Science blog is to get new, reliable, scientifically truthful, interesting information in a concise review-like form. For this someone has to digest original publication and possibly use additional information to compile a new story. Some assurance that the scientific facts and logic were not perturbed, for me, is the quality of the source of the story. I would like to learn something about nature without scrutinizing the raw data and methods of the original publication.
News agencies refer to each other if they use some of the information from outside, scientists mention previous publications in their papers. It is a good and important habit. I think to have references (unless it is an original work) is crucial for all science and every Science Blog. I hope you and other science bloggers will agree with me. With respect, Baz.

RE: Sources

October 18, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 4 weeks ago
Comment id: 32455

Maybe you should provide the original sources in the end as "references", so the readers can understand more.

Press releases

October 18, 2008 by BJS, 1 year 4 weeks ago
Comment id: 32452

Items like this are press releases. Typically, as in this case, there is ample explanation of where the research was conducted, by whom, etc. In this case it is UT Southwestern Medical Center. A quick hop to their site will provide more information on the study in question.

source

October 17, 2008 by bazilio, 1 year 4 weeks ago
Comment id: 32446

Hi. I am kind of new to this blogging, so do not get me wrong... Seriously. A couple of questions for experienced people (a reply from BJS will be appreciated)...
It seems that BJS is not writing these articles... Shouldn't there be a reference to the source of the text? At least out of respect to the one who put effort into this. Or it is a tradition in blogging? Maybe I am missing something and there is a link? No jokes.
Thanks. Baz.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.