Skip to content

Transfusion-free medicine for Jehovah's Witnesses

“Jehovah’s Witness patients no longer have to die for want of blood,” says Patricia Ford, MD, a hematologist/oncologist and Medical Director of the Center for Bloodless Medicine and Surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital, part of the PENN Medicine hospital network. Dr. Ford is one of the pioneers of bloodless surgery and has been teaching its technique to doctor’s around the world.

One technique a bloodless surgery can employ is called “cell salvage” in which blood lost during surgery is siphoned from the body, passed through a filter for cleaning and returned to the body. It can also be used by the physician during surgery to limit blood loss and to avoid the need for transfusion of blood from sources other than the patient.

Jehovah’s Witness patients believe that accepting blood from a source other then themselves defies the scriptural teachings that their religion holds steadfast. Originally developed to meet the needs of the Jehovah’s Witness community, bloodless surgery is transfusion-free and is acceptable to Jehovah Witness followers because they are being reinfused with their own blood. Bloodless surgery and medicine is a viable and life-saving option for these patients and those wary of the safety of the blood supply, and it is safe for a growing number of surgical and medical conditions, except for acute leukemia and traumatic injury.

“Bloodless procedures have proven to be safer than blood transfusion because they help eliminate complications resulting from transfusions such as immunosuppression, infection, diseases from emerging pathogens for which our blood supply is not yet tested,” said Dr. Ford. “The hospital stay is also shorter for our bloodless patients, a cost savings for the patient and the institution,” she continues. Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia is one of the pioneering centers for bloodless medicine and surgery.

Dr. Ford likens the weeks-old blood often used for transfusions to “water from a dirty fish tank.” Depleted of most of its oxygen-carrying capacity, the stored blood is not maximally beneficial to any patient.

Prior to surgery, Dr. Ford prepares patients carefully - using medicines to build red blood cells, and managing their hemoglobin count. A higher hemoglobin level lowers the risk of transfusion.

Dr. Ford has performed the largest number of successful stem cell transplants without blood transfusion of anyone in the world. Among the procedures for which Dr. Ford has prepared patients for bloodless medicine and surgery are cardiothoracic surgery; radical hysterectomies, prostatectomies, cystectomies, and repair of aneurysms, chemotherapy management, and total hip and knee surgery.

The bloodless team at Pennsylvania Hospital has saved the lives of many Jehovah’s Witness patients who otherwise would not have received care. “We see patients from all over the country who come to us for our expertise in bloodless medicine. The needs of the Jehovah’s Witness community have helped us develop practices that can not only save their lives, but can also benefit the entire patient community,” explained Dr. Ford.

From http://pennhealth.com

December 5, 2007

Comments

jehovah witness say no blood

February 4, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 39 weeks ago
Comment id: 27342

stop drinking the haterade. Your not third generation you choose to be one or not. Everyone is first and last generation. You don't have to be called a Jehovah's Witness. Your not born to be one. Any person can take issue with the care that they got from their parents. Guess what some day you do get your own choice so make it and move on.

DOG MADE MAGMA

February 4, 2008 by Gadfly, 1 year 39 weeks ago
Comment id: 27333

I have nothing to add, but I couldn't resist punning on the title of the previous comment.

Forgive the eruption :)

This bite of realism brought to you by "Gadfly."

MAN MADE DOGMA

February 4, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 39 weeks ago
Comment id: 27330

If you take 'whole-blood' or autologous (use your own stored blood) you will be shunned by your family and friends.The Watchtower organization is in control of your life.

I don't want someone else's blood in me anymore that I would want their other body parts heart,kidney,liver unless I needed a lifesaving transplant so goes the same with EMERGENCY blood transfusions.

Don't forget the Watchtower ALLOWS organ transplants and you can get get all the same blood borne diseases Aids,hepatitis from someone else's organs same as you can get from blood.

SO WHAT GIVES HERE?

The blood transfusion issue by Jerry

January 26, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 40 weeks ago
Comment id: 27176

The Watchtower did not institute the forbidding
of eating blood. It was Almighty God Jehovah.
To say thousands have died is stretching far
beyond the truth. Nearly everyone who needs blood is in danger from dying with or without blood and may do so with or without blood Few if any of J.W's take any portion of blood,because it is rarely needed with the many caring doctors now practicing. When God told Noah not to eat meat, but not the blood it is evident there would be fractions of blood in the meat. The principle was: God views blood as sacred and it was the sacred blood of Jesus that redeemed mankind.
A Christian.

God's law on blood

January 25, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 41 weeks ago
Comment id: 27147

Prohibition of blood given to
Noah and all mankind Genesis 9:34
TO Isreal cut off for eating Leviticus 7:26

To Christians: Acts 15:20,29

To people of nations becoming Christians:Acts:2125

Just a bunch of old men. Yes men who loved and looked to Jehovah God for everlastin Life.

Of course there be fractions of blood in meat, Noah could not eat, but blood was not to be eaten.

A Christian

The blood transfusion issue

January 21, 2008 by Jerry (not verified), 1 year 41 weeks ago
Comment id: 27089

The blood transfusion issue is a hot item, even though the Watchtower has practically allowed all 'parts' of the blood individually, just not together! Doesn't the Bible clearly state to "pour ALL the blood onto the ground and cover it with dust because to Jehovah the life blood belongs"?

So, how can the Watchtower execs allow most of the parts of blood which they euphemistically call "blood fractions" YET forbid "whole blood"? Isn't it all sacred to Jehovah,or is this a legal ruse to keep from being sued? Remember thousands of devout obedient Jehovah's Witnesses have DIED for this blood stance.

Jehovah Witness Blood Transfusion

January 18, 2008 by Danny Haszard (not verified), 1 year 42 weeks ago
Comment id: 27029

Many Jehovah's Witnesses men,women and children die every year worldwide due to blood transfusion ban.Rank & file Jehovah's Witness are indoctrinated to be scared to death of blood.
FYI
1) JW's DO USE many parts aka 'fractions' aka components of blood,so if it's 'sacred' to God why the hypocritical contradiction flip-flop?
2) They USE blood collections that are donated by Red cross and others but don't donate back,more hypocrisy.
3) The Watchtower promotes and praises bloodless elective surgeries,this is a great advancement indeed.BUT it's no good to me if I am bleeding to death from a car crash and lose half my blood volume and need EMERGENCY blood transfusion.

---
Danny Haszard born 1957 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness

Jehovah's Witnesses Dogmas

January 9, 2008 by XJW1968-04 (not verified), 1 year 43 weeks ago
Comment id: 26859

Jehovah's Witnesses are a totalitarian cult because they try to cut you off from others who do not have the same beliefs, including family

Jehovah Witness say NO Blood

January 2, 2008 by Danny Haszard (not verified), 1 year 44 weeks ago
Comment id: 26734

Many Jehovah's Witnesses men,women and children die every year worldwide due to blood transfusion ban.Rank & file Jehovah's Witness are indoctrinated to be scared to death of blood.
FYI
1) JW's DO USE many parts aka 'fractions' aka components of blood,so if it's 'sacred' to God why the hypocritical contradiction flip-flop?
2) They USE blood collections that are donated by Red cross and others but don't donate back,more hypocrisy.
3) The Watchtower promotes and praises bloodless elective surgeries,this is a great advancement indeed.BUT it's no good to me if I am bleeding to death from a car crash and lose half my blood volume and need EMERGENCY blood transfusion.
---
Danny Haszard born 1957 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness

(Some educational links provided below:)

http://www.ajwrb.org/ Jehovah Witness blood policy reform site

http://www.towertotruth.net/Articles/blood_transfusions.htm Will you die for a lie?

I Agree with you

December 28, 2007 by lengovene (not verified), 1 year 45 weeks ago
Comment id: 26633

I am Jehovah witness, but i agree with you, bloodless surgery is a "cover" for death doctrine of watchtower.
the watchtower convice us that bloodless medicine is best than blood.
but in some cases blood is a unique form to save life

Maputo, Mozambique
Africa

Jehovah's Witnesses, Blood Transfusions, & Bloodless Program Ads

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26354

"Context is everything," someone once said, and such is certainly the case with regard to this Press Release from Dr. Patricia Ford and the Center for Bloodless Medicine and Surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital. Over the past six weeks, the WatchTower Society religion has been inundated with "bad press" due to public outrage over the needless deaths of two young Jehovah's Witnesses.

On October 25, 2007, 22 year-old Emma Gough died at Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, in England, after delivering twins - a boy and a girl. Gough suffered excessive blood loss during and after the delivery, but she and her husband, who were Jehovah's Witnesses, refused to permit the administering of life-saving blood transfusions. Gough's death received frontpage attention in England's newspapers for almost a week as readers expressed their outrage that the new mother of twins would choose to die for the teachings of a religious cult rather than choose to live for her newborn son and daughter.

Then, on November 28, 2007, a 14 year-old Jehovah's Witness child, named Dennis Lindberg, died at Seattle's Children's Hospital after his Jehovah's Witness legal guardian, and apparently, the Hospital, his doctors, and eventually a local judge all agreed that, as a "mature minor", Lindberg would be allowed to refuse life-saving blood transfusions made necessary by the chemotherapy treatments Lindberg was receiving for his leukemia that was diagnosed only three weeks earlier.

Bloodless medicine and surgery is to be commended in the context of situations where such can be used and not put patients at risk of death. However, it appears like every time another Jehovah's Witness needlessly dies, articles about bloodless medicine and surgery are trotted out to act as possible "cover" for the beliefs of the WatchTower Society, and possibly to make the deaths of Jehovah's Witnesses look like the responsibility of their ill-informed and ill-prepared doctors and hospitals.

re: New trend?

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26351

I would rather say: if there is a need, someone will fulfill it.

There is a real need for these treatments - especially in light of this new study:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071201082321.htm

Eric

Jehovah Witness say NO Blood

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26347

Jehovah's Witnesses elders will investigate and disfellowship any Jehovah Witness who takes a blood transfusion,to say the issue is a 'personal conscience matter' is subterfuge to keep the Watchtower out of lawsuits.

Many Jehovah's Witnesses men,women and children die every year worldwide due to blood transfusion ban.Rank & file Jehovah's Witness are indoctrinated to be scared to death of blood.

FYI
1) JW's DO USE many parts aka 'fractions' aka components of blood,so if it's 'sacred' to God why the hypocritical contradiction flip-flop?

2) They USE blood collections that are donated by Red cross and others but don't donate back,more hypocrisy.

3) The Watchtower promotes and praises bloodless elective surgeries,this is a great advancement indeed.BUT it's no good to me if I am bleeding to death from a car crash and lose half my blood volume and need EMERGENCY blood transfusion.

Know this,the reason that JW refuse blood is because of their spin on the 3000 year old Biblical old testament,modern medicine will eventually make blood donations and transfusions a thing of the past.When this technology happens it won't vindicate the Jehovah's Witnesses and all the deaths that have occured so far.
The Watchtower's rules against blood transfusions will eventually be abolished (very gradually to reduce wrongful death lawsuit liability) even now most of the blood 'components' are allowed.
In 20 years there will be artificial blood and the Red Cross will go on with other noble deeds.

None of these changes will absolve the Watchtower leaders or vindicate their twisted doctrines.
---
Danny Haszard born 1957 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness

Jehovah's Witnesses & Blood Transfusions

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26346

SUMMARIES OF 600 JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES LAWSUITS & COURT CASES

The following website summarizes over 315 U.S. court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah's Witness Parents, including 200+ cases where the JW Parents refused to consent to life-saving blood transfusions for their dying children:

DIVORCE, BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING CHILDREN OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com

The following website summarizes over 285 lawsuits involving Jehovah's Witnesses, including cases involving JW Employees who were injured while working and then died because they refused life-saving blood transfusions:

EMPLOYMENT ISSUES UNIQUE TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESS EMPLOYEES

http://jwemployees.bravehost.com

New trend?

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26345

I wonder if this is is going to be an emerging trend in medicine: pick a minority with strange beliefs/conditions, develop therapy & techniques suitable for them, test and refine and later, release into the general patient community.

Why Jehovah's Witnesses Refuse blood

December 6, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 48 weeks ago
Comment id: 26344

Blood issue at a glance: The Watchtower leadership of the Jehovah's Witnesses say NO blood, BUT they actually DO ALLOW some blood "fractions".

Problem is this variance is so esoteric complicated that by the time special elders appear in the ER with the rule book, the JW patient is at the point of no return,bleeding to death.

NOW,they blame the hospital staff for not having a "cell saver" machine instead of the Watchtower leaders who are responsible for making the rules.

I was born a 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness in 1957 and endured the Watchtower's no blood commandment with longstanding bleeding Crohn's disease.The Watchtower leadership expects followers to die for their dogma and many have.The medical staff get blamed and are 'damned if they do damned if they don't'.

In 20 years there will be artificial blood. and the Red Cross will go on with other noble deeds. None of these changes will absolve the Watchtower leaders or vindicate their twisted doctrines

---
Danny Haszard

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.