Increased turbulence and storms first observed on Jupiter more than two years ago are still raging, according to astronomers from the University of California, Berkeley, and the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, who snapped high-resolution pictures of the planet earlier this month.
Captured with NASA's Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the 10-meter Keck II telescope, this so-called "major upheaval" on Jupiter involves stunning changes in the planet's atmosphere, said lead astronomer Imke de Pater, professor of astronomy at UC Berkeley.
The images are available on NASA's Web site, http://hubblesite.org/news/2008/23.
The upheaval was heralded in December 2005 by a color change from white to red of a large oval near the Great Red Spot, earning it the moniker Red Spot Jr. This oval, formally known as Oval BA, formed six years earlier through a merger of three large white ovals just south of the Great Red Spot - storms that formed in the early 1930s and were prominent in the Voyager era.
The new images, the first since Jupiter emerged from its passage behind the Sun, may show that Jupiter indeed is undergoing a major climate change, as predicted four years ago.
"One of the most notable changes we observe in both the Hubble and Keck images is the change from a rather bland, quiescent band surrounding the Great Red Spot just over a year ago to one that is incredibly turbulent at both sides of the spot," de Pater said. "During all previous HST observations and spacecraft encounters, starting with Voyager in 1979, such turbulence was seen only on the west or left side of the spot."
The Great Red Spot is a persistent, high-pressure storm on Jupiter whose cloud head sticks some 8 kilometers (5 miles) above the surrounding cloud deck. Why the spots are red is a subject of great debate.
Moreover, the color of several bands on the planet has been changing since the upheaval began, said Christopher Go, an amateur astronomer in Cebu, the Philippines, who joined de Pater's team two years ago. Go alerted the astronomical community in early 2006 about the color change of Red Spot Jr.
"Lately, the red color of the Oval BA has faded a little bit, while the Great Red Spot may have turned dark red," Go said.
The UC Berkeley team will work with the amateur astronomy community to investigate the possible origin of this turbulence, which is not understood.
The Great Red Spot and Red Spot Jr. are squeezed between bands called shear flows, where the flow above each storm is moving westward and the flow below is moving eastward. Since the shear flow in each band is slightly different, and the storms are different sizes, Red Spot Jr. drifts slowly eastward toward the Great Red Spot while the Great Red Spot drifts slightly westward toward Red Spot Jr. In late June, this storm will pass the Great Red Spot, as it does every two years.
Interestingly, a third red spot has appeared to the west of the Great Red Spot in the same latitude band.
"Although much smaller in extent, the color is striking," said UC Berkeley team member Michael Wong. ""Like the other two large red storm systems, this newest red spot is bright in near-infrared wavelengths and dark in the ultraviolet. If this spot and the Great Red Spot continue on their courses, they will encounter each other in August, and the small oval will either be absorbed or repelled from the Great Red Spot."
According to Philip S. Marcus, a professor of fluid dynamics at UC Berkeley, analysis of the Hubble and Keck images may support his 2004 conjecture that Jupiter is in the midst of global climate change that will alter temperatures by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and cooler near the south pole. He predicted that large changes would start in the southern hemisphere around 2006, causing the jet streams to become unstable and spawn new vortices.
"The appearance of the planet's cloud system from just north of the equator down to 34 degrees south latitude keeps surprising us with changes and, in particular, with new cloud features that haven't been previously observed," Marcus said. "Whether or not Jupiter's climate has changed due to a predicted warming, the cloud activity over the last two and a half years shows dramatically that something unusual has happened."
"A major goal in taking the Hubble images is to look for changes in the zonal wind profile since the Cassini encounter in 2000," added team member Xylar Asay-Davis. "If we do find major changes, these could provide important supporting evidence for climate change on Jupiter."
The red coloration in the ovals may be generated as their swirling hazes rise to heights like the clouds of the Great Red Spot. Detailed analysis of the Hubble's visible light data and the Keck images at near-infrared wavelengths will reveal the relative altitudes of the cloud tops of the three red ovals, de Pater said. Since all three oval storms are bright at near-infrared wavelengths where methane gas is absorbing, the data already show that all three systems rise up well above the surrounding cloud deck.
The Hubble telescope imaged the entire planet on May 9 and 10 using the Wide-Field Planetary Camera 2, while Keck II focused on the area around the Great Red Spot on May 11 using adaptive optics to sharpen the image.
Dr. Al Conrad, a support astronomer at the Keck Observatory, noted that the team used adaptive optics (AO) to obtain a spatial resolution comparable to that obtained at visible wavelengths with the Hubble telescope. Adaptive optics can take the twinkle out of an object caused by turbulence in the atmosphere, but to do this well, the target must be near another bright object that can serve as a reference. For some of the images, Jupiter's moon Europa was used as the reference "star." But until Europa was visible off the limb of Jupiter, a laser guide star was created near Jupiter to serve this purpose.
"This was our second attempt using the laser to obtain AO-corrected images of Jupiter's surface," Conrad said. "Based on our past experience, we placed the laser beacon slightly farther from Jupiter's bright glow. With this adjustment in place, AO revealed much finer detail on the surface than we saw during our previous observation. By using the laser whenever there is no moon available as an AO reference, we will now have many more opportunities to observe Jupiter with Keck."
In addition to images at 1.2-1.65 microns, where Jupiter's reflected infrared light is measured, the team also obtained a close-up of the three spots at the somewhat longer infrared wavelength of 5 microns that samples thermal radiation from deeper in the atmosphere. All three spots appear dark on the 5-micron image because the clouds obscure heat emanating from lower elevations.
"This image is spectacular," says de Pater. "There is an amazing amount of fine structure and numerous small ovals south of the spots. This image reveals details in the cloud opacity not seen at the other wavelengths."
Comments
THE GREAT RED SPOT
April 15, 2009 by Anonymous, 11 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 36170
Jupiter is undergoing a major climate change is shaking a nnouncement in December 2005 by a color change from white to red of a large oval. seca the great red spot that is why is called the gread red spot junior.
The read spot junior pas the great red spot and makes it every 2 years. Is now third with red laser, the astronomers observed better Jupiter this image is spectacular. there is an increible amount of fine structure and small oval spots of the south and means that Jupiter is warming.
ALUMNO SANTIAGO PINTO CURSO 301
the great red spot
February 23, 2009 by Anonymous, 18 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 34778
the great red spot is the most amazing thing i have heard of that involves the solar system.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great Red Spot chemical makeup?
October 2, 2008 by Anonymous, 39 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 32242
Has someone obtained good spectrograph data from the "Great Red Spot" to reveal its chemical makeup? The article mentions methane, but doesn't go as far as to say that's what the spots solely consist of. Seems likely they are a mixture of several chemicals.
Climate Change is the New Version of GW
May 27, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 5 weeks ago
Comment id: 30343
The new word for Global Warming (which hasn't been working as well lately)is Climate Change, or basically the changing of anything as they are into anything else--hotter, colder, wetter, dryer, etc. Funny, it is similar to the uniformitarianism vs. catastrophism debate of geology about 160 years ago (not exactly the same though). One of the weaknesses of the Alarmists' "climate change" fear program is made apparent by acceptable scientists (probably not involved so much with the "climate change" debate here on Earth) using the term "climate change" for events on a different planet, happening in short time, where humans, industry, or capitalism cannot be blamed. Just the picture and simple description does it. Without really meaning to, it makes apparent a long-known fact that "climate change" happens on other planets, naturally, sometimes surprisingly, thus it can, and always has, and always will, on Earth...not something Alarmists want people to think about, as it strikes directly at the heart of the matter, which is weak to the core and getting weaker.
Instead of calling someone an idiot, how about discussing this?
May 25, 2008 by Fred Bortz, 1 year 5 weeks ago
Comment id: 30099
There is room for reasonable discussion here, as my blog as shown in the past.
See my blog entry of a year ago about Neptune's brightness.
Also see an even older blog discussion about Martian warming.
There is also some of the same name calling interspersed in both of those threads, but the scientific discussion comes through.
BTW, I was expecting someone to jump in and claim that the new red spot on Jupiter means the planet is warming, but I see no one has. The article states that warming was "expected," but doesn't specifically attribute this particular phenomenon to Jovian Warming.
The lack of such a claim may mean that denialists have already "shot their wad" on this planetary warming argument. There is newer data from Mars for example. I don't know what it is, but if it supported the nay-sayers, they'd be proclaiming it.
Anyone have the latest from Mars or Neptune?
Meanwhile, here on Earth, the evidence continues to mount in favor of the IPCC's most recent conclusions. Expect serious international actions soon after January 20, 2009, when we have a U.S. President who recognizes the severity of the issue, regardless of events on Mars, Jupiter, or any other planet.
Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)
No idiot
May 25, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 5 weeks ago
Comment id: 30093
just the opposite. Morons like you will claim that since the climate on Jupiter is changing, we can't be held responsible for what we're doing to our climate here. It all the sun or aliens, or the will of God or whatever.
Jupiter climate change
May 23, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 5 weeks ago
Comment id: 30075
Oh, great. Now we're going to be accused of changing the climate on *other* planets as well as our own?
Post new comment