The Sound of Science: When Ideology Trumps Evidence
May 4, 2006
The people who brought you terminological inexactitudes like "death tax," "the clear skies initiative" and "mission accomplished" have now polluted the language of science. Any research finding they agree with (which isn’t much) is labeled as "sound science"and any research finding they disagree with (which is much) is labeled "junk science."
Finally, a major news outlet, Knight Ridder Newspapers, is exposing the rhetorical perversions, example by example. Previously, author and Chris Mooney did so quite effectively in the book "The Republican War Against Science."
There ought to be plenty of room to argue about what constitutes a valid scientific conclusion, but in the end, science policy must be based on evidence, not on the mudslinging of industry-backed lobbyists and modern day Know Nothings who, when they don't like a real study, go out and create their own.
When ideology trumps evidence, the process isn't sound science at all. It's just the sound of science.
Printer-friendly versionPermalink
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Comments
The Sound Science Behind Plan B
May 4, 2006 by gooznews, 3 years 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 1569
In a New York courtroom late last month, the chief of the new drugs division of the FDA and a long-time government employee, Steve Galson, reportedly testified in a deposition that he and Janet Woodcock, another long-time federal employee, were cut out of the picture by acting commissioner Lester Crawford when the administration overrode an outside advisory committee and vetoed Plan B, the morning-after birth control pill. Why did Crawford do that? One thing we know about him is that he is under investigation for financial improprieties allegedly involving selling stock in a firm regulated by the FDA while he ran the agency.
Heretofore, the administration's ignoring the science supporting Plan B has been tied to pressure from the religious right. Yet we know Exxon Mobil and its ilk are behind the attack on global warming science. Is there a financial angle to the Plan B as well? That court suit, brought by the liberal Center for Reproductive Rights, merits watching.
Merrill Goozner