Science Blog

Science news straight from the oven

Navigation

  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Animals
    • Anthro and Archaeology
    • Bio and Medicine
    • Brain and Behavior
    • Business and Economy
    • Computers and Electronics
    • Education and Outreach
    • Energy and Environment
    • Geoscience
    • Internet and Communication
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Nanotech, Chem and Materials
    • Physics and Numbers
    • Security and Defense
    • Software
    • Space
    • Transportation
  • Reader Blogs
  • Commerce
  • Register/Login
Home Topics Energy and Environment
  • Contact
  • Home
Google

Similar entries

  • Lack of fuel may limit US nuclear power expansion
  • Feds look to advanced simulation for nuke waste dilemma
  • Regional storage facilities could handle nuclear waste
  • NASA Seeks Public Input on Space Reactor

Recent Comments

  • Acne Scar Removal
  • Chemicals
  • Saliva
  • online world
  • brand names
more

Reader Blogs

  • Office of Technology Assessment Archive launched
  • Adhesives for Tapes and Labels Market
  • The first published paper from the Cognition and Language Lab
  • Cats, instincts, and evolution
more

Sustainable nuclear energy moves a step closer

In future a new generation of nuclear reactors will create energy, while producing virtually no long-lasting nuclear waste, according to research conducted by Wilfred van Rooijen, who will receive his Delft University of Technology PhD degree based on this research subject on Tuesday, 12 December.

Wilfred van Rooijen's research, conducted at the Reactor Institute Delft, focused on the nuclear fuel cycle and safety features of a Gas-cooled Fast Reactor (GFR), one of the so-called 'fourth generation' nuclear reactor designs. These designs have a sustainable character: they are economical in their use of nuclear fuel and are capable of rendering a great deal of their own nuclear waste harmless. The ability to actually build such reactors is however still in the very distant future.

The fourth generation GFR uses helium as a coolant at high temperatures. GFR's ultimate objective is to create a closed nuclear fuel cycle, in which only natural uranium is used as a raw material and in which the resulting waste consists of only nuclear fission products. Uranium and heavier isotopes, such as plutonium and americum, are recycled in the reactor and ultimately burned up (fissioned). In the reactors in use today, these heavy isotopes determine the long-term radioactivity of the nuclear waste. A closed nuclear fuel cycle therefore allows for maximum use of the raw materials, while at the same time substantially reducing the life-span of the waste.

This PhD research showed that it is possible to obtain a closed nuclear fuel cycle with a GFR. It also revealed that the GFR could use the waste materials of other light water reactors (LWR). The Gas-cooled Fast Reactor can therefore serve as an 'incinerator' of nuclear waste. To increase the GFR's safety, special elements have been designed to automatically shut down the reactor during incidents. Van Rooijen's research has shown that with these elements the reactor is capable of withstanding incidents without damage to the nuclear fuel.

From Delft University




Submitted by BJS on Mon, 2006-12-11 10:09.

  • Energy and Environment


  • Printer-friendly version
  • 2015 reads


"Fuel's Gold" article in Financial Times May 31 '08

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2008-05-31 14:35.

The article pushes thorium as the fuel of the future after the author (Sam Knight) met with Seth Grae in Moscow; the founder of a new company Thorium Power. There many flaws in the article e.g. thorium is not a fuel per se but a breeder material for U233. It forgets earlier studies, such as the HTGR, which was abandoned (although efforts to revive it are current). What I particularly dislike is the statement that new proposals to build new reactors are based on "old" technology i.e. PWRs, BWRs and HWRs. These have been improved dramatically, especially with respect to lowering down times,raising power outputs and extending lifetimes to 60 years. Perhaps in 50 years time we may need to consider thorium as an extra resource as uranium sources dwindle. Brian Frost (Argonne National Lab. retiree). P.S. see Sustainablenuclear.org for more information.

  • reply

Ummm no

Submitted by belg4mit on Mon, 2006-12-11 22:34.

Anything which consumes high grade material available in finite supply and spits out unusable crap is not sustainable. Yes, these fuel cycles eek out more energy from the Uranium and fusion wastes but that's not the same thing as sustainable.

  • reply

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Copyright, Science Blog.
Think. It's not illegal yet. Read our Privacy Policy.
RoopleTheme