Follow us on 



Sexism pays: Men with traditional views of women earn more

22 Sep 2008

Anonymous's picture

When it comes to sex roles in society, what you think may affect what you earn. A new study has found that men who believe in traditional roles for women earn more money than men who don't, and women with more egalitarian views don't make much more than women with a more traditional outlook.

Timothy Judge, PhD, and Beth Livingston from the University of Florida, analyzed data from a nationally representative study of men and women who were interviewed four times between 1979 and 2005. A total of 12,686 people, ages 14 to 22 at the beginning of the study, participated; there was a 60 percent retention rate over the course of the study. Results were published in the September issue of the Journal of Applied Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association.

At each of the four interviews, participants were asked about their views on gender roles in the work force and at home. They answered questions such as whether they believed a woman's place is in the home, whether employing wives leads to more juvenile delinquency, if a man should be the achiever outside the home and if the woman should take care of the home and family. Participants were also asked about their earnings, religious upbringing, education, whether they worked outside the home and their marital status, in addition to other topics. Prior studies have shown that men tend to hold more traditional gender roles than do women, though this gap has narrowed over time.

The researchers looked specifically at gender role views as a predictor of a person's earnings. They controlled for job complexity, number of hours worked and education. Their analyses showed that men in the study who said they had more traditional gender role attitudes made an average of about $8,500 more annually than those who had less traditional attitudes.

"More traditional people may be seeking to preserve the historical separation of work and domestic roles. Our results prove that is, in fact, the case," Judge said. "This is happening even in today's work force where men and women are supposedly equal as far as participation."

For women, however, the situation was reversed. Women who held more traditional views about gender roles made an average of $1,500 less annually than the women with more egalitarian views. Put another way, if a married couple holds traditional gender role attitudes, the husband's earning advantage was predicted to be eight times greater than a married couple where the husband and wife have more egalitarian attitudes.

"These results show that changes in gender role attitudes have substantial effects on pay equity," Judge said. "When workers' attitudes become more traditional, women's earnings relative to men suffer greatly. When attitudes become more egalitarian, the pay gap nearly disappears."

Notably, the results also did not fundamentally change when other factors were controlled, such as industry, occupation, hours worked, and number of children. "These results cannot be explained by the fact that, in traditional couples, women are less likely to work outside the home," Judge said. "Though this plays some role in our findings, our results suggest that even if you control for time worked and labor force participation, traditional women are paid less than traditional men for comparable work."

The researchers also sought to understand why some people hold more traditional or less traditional perceptions of gender roles. Some associations they found were:

* People living in Northeastern cities had less traditional views regarding gender roles

* People whose parents both worked outside the home had less traditional views regarding gender roles

* Married, religious people tended to have more traditional gender role views

* Younger people had less traditional views but became more traditional over time

The authors offered suggestions for future research, including investigating the relationship between happiness and job attitudes among people with specific gender role views arguing that more money and happiness doesn't necessarily always go together for some people.

The researchers believe their results show that the gender pay gap is not just an economic phenomenon. "Psychology has an important role to play, too," said Judge. "Our country's policies have been leaning toward gender equality for decades now. But, according to our study, traditional gender role views continue to work against this goal."

22 Sep 2008
Share |

Anonymous's picture

60 percent retention rate..?

I personally don't know what average retention rates are for this kind of research, but in my opinion, it seems at all possible that those who refuse the idea of sexism may have left the research, thus producing a false, or partly invalid result. Can someone elaborate on this?



Anonymous's picture

oops.

I agree with the one before, about correlation. And my comment was directed toward the "not just sexism" comment.



Anonymous's picture

I agree with previous

I agree with previous comment. Your argument is weak and unsubstantiated.



MainFragger's picture

Not just sexism..

This is all just an offshoot of the golden rule. He who owns the gold makes the rules. Also, My house, my rules..

Simply put, man traditionally brought home the bread and built most businesses from the ground up. Giving power to anyone that is not a bird of a feather is typically a mistake. Because their view is different then yours, and they will go in directions other than what you want. So the best way to keep people from taking your power is to keep them down. Pimps up..Hoes down.. Its a simple formula.. What I don't let them take from me, they don't have, and I do. Whether it be money, power, or freedoms.

The people who "win" the game by having the most toys, do it not by being a successful businessman, but by controlling all the rules that allow their business to work.

You want to keep more money and not give it out to women workers..simple enough.. You decide that Women have PMS and sometimes don't work as hard as men so you don't have to pay them as much. Blacks might steal, or might be lazy workers, or just plain don't know any better.. Lets not pay THEM as much. Hmm... Foreigners are hard to understand, which creates some business challenges..Pay them less.

Some people may think I am exaggerating, or saying that companies are underhanded. But what you have to understand is that the guy at the top of any company sees everything in terms of, I made this, its mine, and I have to remain competitive by keeping as much money to myself as possible.

Many companies in the late 90's and early 2000's made more money off of finding ways to save money then they ever could off of actual sales. (decreasing warranties, being less liberal with giving away manuals and accessories, decreasing manufacturing costs, reducing office supply spending, using temps so that they don't have to pay benefits..and lots of other things.)

Keeping these things in mind, its very easy to feel that the best way to hold on to what is your, is to deny everyone else whatever they need to get it themselves or take it from you. The sexism and racism and whateverelsism of it is incidental. The true emotion is a pure unadulterated combination of averice and greed. But the person that is willing to take things to level, often have no problem with playing the race card, the sexist card or whatever to achieve their wants and needs.



Anonymous's picture

Correlation does not equal

Correlation does not equal causation.


Post new comment






About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.