Skip to content

Organic food miles take toll on environment

Organic fruit and vegetables may be healthier for the dinner table, but not necessarily for the environment, a University of Alberta study shows.

The study, conducted by a team of student researchers in the Department of Rural Economy at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, showed that the greenhouse gas emitted when the produce is transported from great distances mitigates the environmental benefits of growing the food organically.

“If you’re buying ‘green’, you should consider the distance the food travels. If it’s travelling further, then some of the benefits of organic crops are cancelled out by extra environmental costs,” said researcher Vicki Burtt.

Burtt and her fellow researchers compared the cost of ‘food miles’ between organic and conventionally grown produce, and found that there was little difference in the cost to the environment.

Food miles are defined as the distance that food travels from the field to the grocery store. The study found that the environmental cost of greenhouse gas (CO2) emitted to transport 20 tonnes of organically grown produce was comparable to that of bringing the same amount of conventional fruit and vegetables to market.

For the study, the team collected retail price data from six grocery stores and interviewed suppliers about their shipping methods. They created comparable food baskets of both organic and conventionally-grown fruit and vegetables being transported to Edmonton stores by truck, train or ship, and found that most travels by truck. Since 1970 truck shipping has increased, replacing more energy-efficient rail and water transport.

The researchers calculated that the annual environmental costs for a city the size of Edmonton were $135,000 to $183,000 (5,492-7,426 tonnes CO2) for conventional produce and $156,000 to $175,000 (6,348-7,124 tonnes CO2) for organic produce. Many of the organic products are travelling further than the conventional food. Two items in particular, mangoes and green peppers, were shipped much further than their conventional counterparts (4,217 and 1,476 kilometres, respectively). The mangoes were shipped from Ecuador and Peru as opposed to Mexico, and the peppers came from Mexico as opposed to Canada or the United States.

To help reduce greenhouse gases, Burtt recommends that shoppers switch to buying locally produced food at grocery stores or farmers’ markets when possible, and that any future government policy on the environment should consider the reduction of CO2 emissions associated with food transport. The study also found that a large gap between total costs to the consumer and the price paid in the store for organic produce indicates that retailers could cover the environmental costs without passing those costs on to the consumer.

University of Alberta

June 6, 2007

Comments

Buy Locally - Buy Now

April 2, 2009 by Anonymous, 13 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 35798

This is an invitation to all of the students and staff associated with the Department of Rural Economy at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. Come, buy locally grown, grasss-fed Alberta Beef at Terra Caritatis Patris Farm and enjoy the best - from a certified organic farm! Our best regards, Tim & Maighread Axe 780-853-6046

Organic food miles take toll on environment: Reply.

June 14, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 years 2 weeks ago
Comment id: 23966

Sorry mate, but it is pretty obvious that if your are taking the trouble to actually stay organic, then it should be a safe bet that you would be buying local anyway. As you should realize, the longer the distance for a product to travel, the more chance that that product would have leaked more nutrients on the long journey to its final destination.
The point seems to be lost in the fact that everyone is commenting on how much emissions is caused by a 2,000 mile well traveled cucumber and not the fact that you would have to consume maybe up to 20% more of that cucumber to get the same nutrients as a locally grown one. Can you see where I am going with this. The big message is, shop local and in season. There are enough recipes both good, bad & outrageous out there for you not to be having to buy out of season produce. Who on earth came up with the great idea that it was natural to eat a strawberry in December anyway.
With all this talk of actually staying organic, shouldn't it be a further topic to see how many people would actually try to supplement their weekly shopping with home grown veg. You must admit, it does taste a whole lot better than store bought produce; and you have the added satisfaction of gloating to the world and his wife that you not only cooked that great tomato sauce from scratch, but you also grew most of the ingredients on your small balcony too boot.
My mother at an early age gave me this advise; "Cooking is 10% knowledge and 90% common sense". In my opinion, this practice should also be used when purchasing produce as well. Use your head, as you and your loved ones will be digesting the culinary masterpieces that you have slaved over in that hot & humid home chefs' kitchen.

This study is completely misleading

June 7, 2007 by Ken Southerland (not verified), 2 years 3 weeks ago
Comment id: 23885

To blame organics for food miles traveled is just plain ridiculous. Why not blame people's thirst for bananas and oranges and video games? While I agree that buying your produce locally is extremely important, not only in environmental impact but because you are supporting your neighbors, there is no reason people shouldn't demand both. Capitalism's only recourse for this is the wallet. If customer's are buying organic and the local farmer wants to have their products compete, well then they will have to switch to organic practices won't they?

The study seems to assume that the only environmental harm is CO2 produced in the transport of food, while ignoring the environmental damage done by pesticides and petroleum derived fertilizers.

This is nothing new and

June 6, 2007 by belg4 mit (not verified), 2 years 3 weeks ago
Comment id: 23880

This is nothing new and indeed not limited to organic produce. If you're buying at a farmer's market (closer, more likely to be organic) you win doubly. Organic from Whole Foods probably comes from the other side of the country (salad to the east coast, peaches and citrus to the west, everything to the middle). Same goes for your conventional crops. Some plants grow best in certain climates (FL orange juice needn't worry about MA OJ anytime soon).

And what about those berries and watermelon you insist on buying in the offseason, all the way from Chile? Transportation=pollution is not news! Are most people oblivious of how this relates to their food, and its source? Probably. But this isn't anything worthy of "new" research, and rather smacks of trying to take the shine off of organic apples by conventional farmers.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.