Skip to content

Why Men Never Remember and Women Never Forget

Excerpt The following is an excerpt from the book Why Men Never Remember and Women Never Forget by Marianne J. Legato, MD, FACP and Laura Tucker Published by Rodale; September 2005;$24.95US/$33.95CAN; 1-57954-897-0 Copyright © 2005 Marianne J. Legato, MD, FACP and Laura Tucker

What We Know -- And What We Don't

I'd like to present you with an overview of the science as we currently understand it, via true-or-false statements that come from questions I've been asked at lectures and by my patients. As you read, I'd like to remind you that while there do seem to be gender-specific ways of thinking, remembering, and experiencing emotion, those differences do not necessarily connote superiority. Dr. Eric Kandel's groundbreaking research on learning assures us that our brains aren't set in stone, even if our sex is. If we learn from each other, then these differences become opportunities, not divisions.

True or False: Sex is determined by our biology. True and false. Although our sex is determined at the moment of our conception, and we stay that sex for the rest of our lives, we actually become more or less female or male over the course of our lives. Let's take a look at how this happens.

The sex chromosome contributed by our fathers pushes us to form male or female sex organs. Those organs, in turn, release hormones that cause dramatic and sex-specific changes to every organ and tissue in our bodies -- including the brain -- and program them to respond in sex-specific ways down the line. Varying levels of hormones over the course of our lives continue the process of sexing us.

In other words, our genes set us up for the sex we'll be, and our hormones salt the stew. The complex interaction between these two factors -- especially during specific windows when their levels drop or surge as they do during puberty and menopause -- make the two sexes different and each of us different from one another as well.

Nature is only part of the explanation for the differences between us. In fact, one of the thorniest challenges faced by those of us who study gender differences is teasing out which differences are due to the genetic and hormonal components of our biology and which are the result of "nurture," or how we're conditioned and shaped by our environment.

Society certainly believes men and women are different and expects sex-specific behavior from us. Even when children are young, parents encourage sons and daughters to do quite different kinds of activities, and in fact, boys and girls seem to enjoy quite different things.

These very disparate paradigms of what it means to be male or female provoke important questions about the difference between the sexes. How many of the differences between us are the result of the gender roles that the society of the time imposes? Are our sex-specific talents, temperament, and world view inescapably hardwired into our central nervous system? Or is our sexually stereotyped behavior choreographed by our culture's expectations of us?

Some of the differences between men and women are hardwired. But as soon as we're born, the environment works in powerful ways to interact with, and even change, our hardwiring to shape the way we act and interface with others. The idea that our experiences can change our brains means that the strands of conditioning and biology are more closely intertwined than we'd even thought. Treating your daughter like she's a girl may make her more so. The brain is never "done," but continues to grow and change as long as we provide it with inspiration.

True or False: There are significant differences between the brains of men and women. True. It seems self-evident that men and women would have different brains -- after all, what could be more fundamental about us than whether we're male or female? And yet, for most of medical history, doctors and scientists assumed that all the organs of men and women were the same, except for those directly involved in reproduction. Research suggesting otherwise is very new: Scientists first made the observation that there were differences in the physical structure of the brains of female and male rats a little more than three decades ago. It has now been confirmed that this is true not only in other species with two sexes, like songbirds and monkeys, but in our own as well: The anatomy of the brain and how it works are different in men and women.

True or False: The brain has a sex at birth. True. Our sex is fixed and immutable -- and not just at birth, but from the very moment of conception. That sex has implications for all the systems in our bodies, including our brains.

But in a sense, this is a trick question, because while we are undeniably and indelibly male or female from the very beginning, there are a variety of factors that contribute to the process by which we acquire our sex over the course of our lives. So, although you're always male or female, other factors are working on you at specific stages throughout your life to make you more or less that way.

What are those factors? Our genes are the unique cellular blueprint that makes us who we are, including our sex: The sex chromosome we get from our fathers at conception determines which sex organs we'll develop. An X chromosome from Dad means the baby will have two Xs and develop into a female. A Y chromosome means that there will be an XY complement, creating a boy. The sex organs we develop, in turn, release sex-specific hormones, which continue the process not only in the uterus but also during certain windows of time throughout life -- puberty and menopause, for example -- when hormone levels change precipitously. Those hormones also turn certain genes on or off, which further influences the sex-specific functions of our tissues, which is why more than one teenage girl has cursed her mother for the size (large or small) of her new breasts.

These genes are also why hormone levels vary from person to person. Those hormone levels affect our behavior. Individuals with high testosterone levels, for instance, are bolder, more aggressive, and more focused on a single goal. They smile less, have a higher libido, and are more likely to engage in extramarital sex.

There's one more factor influencing our sex -- our experiences. A striking example of this is the conduct of some of the female soldiers at Abu Ghraib, the American-run prison in Iraq. Many of us were shocked -- not just by the brutalities these women meted out, but at the discovery that women were just as capable of acts of humiliation and savagery as men. Clearly, experience is an important factor in modifying behavior.

True or False: Men's brains are bigger. True. Whenever I lecture on this subject, nothing gets a more outraged response than this simple biological truth: Men's brains are bigger than those of women and weigh 10 percent more.

But size isn't everything. Women have more gray matter in certain parts of their brains and more intricate and extensive communications between brain cells than men, particularly in the frontal cortex. This is the area involved in judgment and decision making: the "executive center" of the brain. Some scientists think that this relatively more intricate system of neuronal interconnections explains why women's brains have a higher rate of blood flow. In fact, smaller brains may be more efficient. Ounce for ounce, women get more brain bang for the buck, possibly because of the greater degree of connectivity between cells.

And while it is true that male fetuses have more brain cells than female ones do, this may be the reason boys have more developmental defects than girls; it may require more energy to keep these larger brains in tip-top shape. It takes a lot of energy to drive a brain, especially a baby's brain, which has twice the number of working connections between cells as an adult's does. Boys, with their bigger brains, have significantly lower heart rates and lower body temperatures than girls; just when they need the energy to support their bigger brains, they fall behind! A higher number of boys have developmental disorders that become apparent in early childhood, such as mental retardation, expressive and receptive language disorders, stuttering, and autism; the energy deficit may explain why.

True or False: Women are better at multitasking, while men are better when concentrating on a single task from beginning to completion. True. Ruben Gur, PhD, and Raquel Gur, MD, PhD, at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, measured blood flow and activity in men's and women's brains, and they found repeatedly that women use more parts of their brains when given a wide variety of verbal and spatial tasks. They believe that this may contribute to women's ability to focus on a number of different things at one time.

A new study has raised an important question: Women may be better at multitasking, but is multitasking really the most efficient way to work? Newer research shows that switching back and forth from one task to another takes precious seconds of reevaluation, and those seconds add up. As the researchers point out, in the best-case scenario, this makes you only slightly less efficient -- but in the case of someone talking on a cell phone and driving, that fraction of a second may make the difference between life and death.

The conclusion I personally have come to is this: Multitasking is certainly helpful when you don't have any options, when your assistant is out sick or when you're trying to put dinner on the table while at the same time making sure your children are entertained and safe. But I find that when I need to concentrate on writing, it's helpful for me to turn off my phone and my e-mail program, with its constant "new mail" alerts, so that I can better and more purely concentrate on the task at hand.

True or False: The effects of our sex hormones (such as estrogen and testosterone) are restricted to the reproductive system. False. There are two interesting things about hormones. The first is how many hormones play a role in sexing us -- not just the sex hormones, as you might think, but others, like the ones we release when we're under stress.

The second is how many systems these hormones affect. Yes, estrogen is responsible for menstrual periods, but did you know that it also has a profound effect on the way women learn, think, and remember? For instance, estrogen may be one of the keys to the earlier questions about the differences between schizophrenia in men and women. Here's a more pedestrian example: I tell patients with young girls to keep an eye on their daughters' sneakers. The hormonal changes that announce puberty and bring on a girl's first menstrual period will cause a sudden surge in her growth and a leap in her shoe size as well.

All of the hormones in the body have far-reaching effects, which is why it's so important to take note when differing levels of them are found in men and women.

True or False: Boys and girls develop on different schedules. True. One of the most important ways in which our brains are shaped is not through growth, but the programmed death of a large number -- about half -- of the neurons originally produced as the brain forms. This pruning process goes on from the final month of pregnancy and continues long after birth. Synapses, or connections between cells, that don't get reinforced by stimulation from the outside world atrophy and eventually disappear. The connections that are stimulated grow stronger and become permanent. You have to use it, or you lose it, and practice makes perfect.

It's a mysteriously wasteful process. Why don't we simply make what we need to begin with? I like to think that we're choosing the neurons that function optimally, like choosing the prettiest and healthiest flowers out of a bunch for a bouquet.

This brain tailoring process is part of what makes us unique: Our experiences -- the stimulation we're exposed to, or protected from -- have a very real impact on who we become. If we don't have appropriate input during these times, the systems can be impaired forever, and there are all too many examples of abused and neglected children who are cut off from interaction during crucial developmental windows and will never develop normal language skills as a result. Less tragically, it's what makes the differences between siblings and even identical twins who carry the same genetic information.

New information also tells us that how and when this brain tailoring occurs between the ages of 6 and 17 is different for boys and girls. There are major differences in when boys and girls prune and expand the connections in their brains, and in which areas they tend, as well as in the numbers of connections between the two halves of the brain in boys and girls. The hormones that surge during puberty (testosterone in boys, estrogen in girls) play a major role in these processes, as they have very different effects on brain function. These hormonal differences may be the reason for the different pace of development in pubescent boys and girls.

True or False: We treat boys and girls differently. True. Of course, the society and culture in which we raise boys and girls has a tremendous impact on their outcomes. A landmark study done in the seventies showed that women tended to coo at babies dressed in pink jumpsuits, while men tossed those in blue up into the air. People tend to talk to girls, while they encourage boys to play with mechanical toys and objects, often from a very young age. In fact, this research leaves us unable to tell what comes first. Do the sex-specific innate areas of the brain make one sex function differently from the other? Or is it the impact of gender-specific behavior, induced by the societal roles we are asked to play? Gender bias may be even more important than we once thought, if the structure of our brains is in play.

About the Author MARIANNE J. LEGATO, MD, FACP, is a professor of clinical medicine at Columbia University, where she founded and heads the Partnership for Gender-Specific Medicine. One of the world's foremost experts on gender medicine and winner of many awards for her work, she is the author of The Female Heart, What Women Need to Know, and Eve's Rib.

Copyright © 2005 Marianne J. Legato, MD, FACP and Laura Tucker

August 16, 2005

Comments

sex

September 23, 2009 by Anonymous, 8 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 44938

sex is an effection between a men and a wonen

well, I add a voice to this

May 15, 2009 by Anonymous, 27 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 36653

well, I add a voice to this too - and i may say, that this si correct - not only the creative record of the women species( or spices) is negligible, their efforts at interconnectivity cause more trouble than peace. Remeber one thing, they have flaky mouths, and jabbering is not interconnectivity. And women please excuse us, you are only good for love making yes, and leave world, matter, creation, and tomorrow to men

Re:Typically one-sided sexist pseudoscience

September 5, 2008 by MarshallBarnes, 1 year 11 weeks ago
Comment id: 31819

I understand why your comment is annonymous. It's because you don't have the stones to put your name to such an ignorant response. It would put an identity to the an individual who obviously has low self-esteem as well as a low level of reading comprehension.

If you had been able to comprehend the above article you would have been able to understand that some of the same points you're trying to make are supported in the article. This makes the theme of your remarks reflexive, triggered solely by your inaccurate perception that because a few hot button words were used by a female researcher, that the article was out to get men.

I find your comments about creativity and gender otherwise amusing. As a man, my opinion of other men who use gender issues to try to bolster their low self-esteem in apologetic claims of victimization, is somewhat akin to the one that I had of pseudobullies who would pick-on smaller kids but fold the minute anyone stood up to them (real bullies only backed down after someone actually beat them up). One of them tried that on me once. He never did again. The real bullies, who were bigger, I was always able to outwit. The pseudo-bully, however, got my fist.

As a researcher in creativity, I know that your comment about multi-tasking and creativity being at the opposite ends of the same pole is patently stupid. I possess both skills and I can assure you that I have a record of doing both. I also witnessed how three high school physics students were able to figure out a screw-up that Stephen Hawking made that an entire planet of male PhDs never caught for 18 years. Those three (along with two boys) were girls http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/6809-city-council-to-recognize-physi... . So much for girls not being able to hang with the boys in physics.

To be sure there are flaws in the article, but those flaws are mostly in relying on studies that are done using 20th century protocols. A new science that I have developed called technogninetics would certainly undermine the results of the study on multitasking by Ruben Gur, PhD, and Raquel Gur, MD, PhD, at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, because it would have brought into play the types of tasks that were given to the test subjects. Technocogninetics is the science of how things or devices effect human consciousness. It has proven to be the over-riding factor in determining flaws in studies published by two major universities so far, so it's not anything to sneeze at.

The way it would work in the Ruben/Raquel Gur test is in determining the types of tasks that would have to be completed and comparing them to what the subjects enjoy doing. For example, find out what types of things each subject likes to do and what things they really don't enjoy. Give each subject a single thing and a multi-tasking thing to do in each category. Then give each subject the types of tasks that were already done in the study. Now you can see an accurate scale of results showing how male and female subjects handle single versus multitasking assignments and if the level of interest is at all a factor in determining the skill at which those objectives are completed. You could also see the brain activity, which I predict, would show that the technocogninetic effect of the type of task would play a major role in how the brain activity was stimulated. This stimulation would subsequently skew the gender results and show a different set of outcomes. I can't predict, however, what those outcomes would be. It would be interesting to find out.

The take home on this is that although, there are differences between boys and girls, essentially those differences can be leveled by environment, training, psychology, and other factors, to a point that they are essentially stereotypes dervied from statistical groupings and not hard facts found consistantly in individual samplings.

It is not men, but very insecure little boys, who hurl spiteful remarks at anyone or anything that would seem to threaten the perception of male superiority over women. The irony is that real men know who they are and are secure in that knowledge. That's something that the pathetic little boys, who never grew-up, will never have and never did have, even when it was supposed to be strictly a man's world.

Typically one-sided sexist pseudoscience

September 5, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 11 weeks ago
Comment id: 31817

I get it - women are superior in every way, and even where men are shown to have some advantage (bigger brains), the female authors use this against them. Anyone reading this, do a search on 'men women grey white cells' - we know since 2003 that men have 10 TIMES as many grey cells, responsible for concentrated thinking, while women have more white cells for interconnectivity. Thus women would seem to have a facility for multitasking. But a community of multitaskers would still be living in the Stone Age without the concentrated creativity of men. Creativity and mutitasking are two ends of a pole - but female writers and pseudoscience researchers leave out this most vital point - the incredible lack of creativity of these supposed master multitaskers. If you have creativity, you can invent a machine that multitasks more than a billion women put together. Now when women invent a better machine than us men, better multitasking computers and software, perhaps THEN they could risk opening their mouths to boast about dubious biological advantages. Be honest, the historical record of female creativity is embarrassing. Ignoring this, and trying to boost their own egos in such a dubious way, merely demonstrates a major inferiority complex.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.