Researchers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center have found an explanation for why some lung cancers stop responding to the drugs erlotinib (Tarceva) and gefitinib (Iressa). This discovery may lead to the development of new therapies to use when these agents stop working. The research is to be published online in the open-access international journal PLoS Medicine on February 22, 2005.
Gefitinib and erlotinib are so-called targeted therapies, in that they halt the growth of certain cancers by zeroing in on a signaling molecule critical to the survival of those cancer cells. The two drugs are effective in about 10 percent of US patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous work from this group at MSKCC and from groups at Harvard Medical School showed that the two drugs work specifically in patients whose cancers contain mutations in a gene that encodes the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The MSKCC team has also shown that lung cancer patients with these mutations are often people who have never smoked.
"Although these targeted therapies are initially effective in this subset of patients, the drugs eventually stop working, and the tumors begin to grow again. We call this acquired or secondary resistance," said Vincent A. Miller, MD, a thoracic oncologist at MSKCC and one of the study's two lead authors. "This is different from primary resistance, which means that the drugs never work at all," Dr. Miller said.
The study involved six patients who had received treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib and who later developed acquired resistance. Researchers studied samples taken from the patients' tumors at different times before and during treatment. All of the tumors had the kinds of mutations in the EGFR gene that were previously associated with responsiveness to these drugs. But, in three of the six patients, they found that tumors that grew despite continued therapy had an additional mutation in the EGFR gene, strongly implying that the second mutation was the cause of drug resistance. Further biochemical studies showed that this second EGFR mutation, which was the same in all three tumors, could confer resistance to the EGFR mutants normally sensitive to these drugs.
"It is especially interesting that the mutation we found is strictly analogous to a mutation that makes other kinds of tumors resistant to another targeted therapy, imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®)," said Harold Varmus, President of MSKCC and senior author of the study. "Acquired resistance to Gleevec is a well-known problem, and understanding its molecular causes has led to the design of other drugs that overcome that resistance," Dr. Varmus said. Imatinib mesylate is used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a stomach tumor called gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and other tumors caused by mutations in signaling enzymes like EGFR.
Non-small cell lung cancer makes up about 80 percent of all lung cancers. Mutations in a gene called KRAS (pronounced KAY-rass),which encodes a signaling protein activated by EGFR, are found in 15 to 30 percent of these cancers. The presence of a mutated KRAS gene in a biopsy sample is associated with primary resistance to these drugs, as reported by the same group of MSKCC investigators in the January, 2005, issue of PLoS Medicine. At this time there is no targeted therapy for patients with KRAS mutations.
"Tumor cells from patients in our study who developed secondary resistance to gefitinib and erlotinib after an initial response on therapy did not have mutations in KRAS. Rather, these tumor cells had new mutations in EGFR. This further indicates that secondary resistance is very different from primary resistance," said William Pao, MD, PhD, a molecular biologist and thoracic oncologist and the study's other lead author. "We are now trying to figure out other possible reasons why gefitinib or erlotinib stop working. We also hope to identify mutations in other potential cancer-causing genes that are critical for lung cancers to survive. Even though many mutated oncogenes have already been found, the crucial genes are still unaccounted for in about 50 percent of non-small cell cancers," Dr. Pao said.
This work is the result of collaboration at MSKCC between basic researchers in the laboratory and clinicians who treat patients with lung cancer. Other investigators who participated in the study were Katerina A. Politi, PhD; Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD; Romel Somwar, PhD; Maureen F. Zakowski, MD; and Mark G. Kris, MD. The work was supported by an anonymous donor.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center is the world's oldest and largest institution devoted to prevention, patient care, research and education in cancer. Our scientists and clinicians generate innovative approaches to better understand, diagnose and treat cancer. Our specialists are leaders in biomedical research and in translating the latest research to advance the standard of cancer care worldwide.
From Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Comments
Tarceva
October 27, 2009 by Anonymous, 3 weeks 6 days ago
Comment id: 45818
Although my response is not nearly as technical as the article or even the last user's comment, I have to say that I am hoping and praying that further research will explain why this drug stops working and how to implement a new drug or some other form of treatment. My Dad was diagnosed with Stage IV non-small cell lumg cancer back in 2003 and sadly passed away in June of 2008. With that said, I whole-heartedly attribute much of his "prolonged" life to Tarveva. He was on a clinical trial through Dana Farber in Boston, and with Tarceva, the tumors had shrunk to a "managable" size. He did have the rash/redness side effect, but to me he was able to walk me down the aisle and meet, know and love his two grandchildren when he orginally was given 18 months to live and survived 5-years. I just wish that Tarceva did not stop working and maybe I would have him here today.
Tarceva And Iressa
August 26, 2007 by gpawelski (not verified), 2 years 13 weeks ago
Comment id: 24707
Increasingly, targeted oral-dose anti-cancer drugs like Tarceva and Iressa are found to treat cancers effectively in those that it is helping, and seen as an intergral and necessary part of a patient's cancer care.
Tarceva and Iressa are very similar drugs, small molecule inhibitors of tyrosine kniase, a key intermediary in the EGF cascade pathway. Drugs that inhibit Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR inhibitor). EGF-targeted drugs are poorly-predicted by measuring the ostensible target (EGFR), but can be well-predicted by measuring the effect of the drugs on the function of 'live"cells. It is an area of cancer research which has been abandoned by most of the cancer research establishment, except for a conscientious band of cell biologists.
Oncologists prescribe patients one standard empiric chemotherapy regimen after another, until they find one that works. This often can expose patients to the side effects of chemotherapy, without showing any cancer-killing results. Guesswork can be done in a laboratory instead. The tactic of using biopsied cells to predict which cancer treatments will work best for the patient, by taking pieces of tumor tissue, apply different chemotherapy treatments to it and examine the results to see which drug or combination of drugs do the best job killing the tumor cells.
A new laboratory test has accurately identified patients who would benefit from treatment with the molecularly-targeted anti-cancer therapies Tarceva and Iressa. This could help solve the problem of knowing which patients can tolerate costly, new treatments and their harmful side-effects. These "smart" drugs do not work for everyone, and a test to determine the efficacy of these drugs in a patient could be the first crucial step in personalizing treatment to the individual.
By inhibiting anti-apoptosis with Tarceva or Iressa, the cells undergo apoptosis and die. And it is detected at the whole cell level in the cell culture assays and reported out -- prospectively -- that this correlates strikingly with patient survival. The new test predicted accurately for the survival of patients treated with the targeted drugs.
The new test relies upon what is called "functional profiling," in which living tumor cells are removed from an individual cancer patient and exposed in the laboratory to the new drugs. A variety of metabolic and apoptotic measurements are then used to determine if a specific drug was successful at killing the patient's cancer cells. The "functional profiling" method assesses the activity of a drug upon combined effect of all cellular processes, using combined metabolic and morphologic endpoints, at the cell "population" level (rather than at the single-cell level), measuring the interaction of the entire genome.
The "functional profiling" method makes the statistically significant association between prospectively reported test results and patient survival. Using the EGFRx Assay with "functional profiling" can correlate test results which are obtained in the lab and reported to physicians prior to patient treatment, with significantly longer or shorter overall patient survival depending upon whether the drug was found to be effective or ineffective at killing the patient's tumor cells in the laboratory.
Tarceva and Iressa have been shown to benefit those that are benefitting from it. If the drugs are working for some people, then obviously there are others out there who would also benefit. Who are those that would benefit from its use? All the more reason to test the tumor first.
Post new comment