Skip to content

NASA's Chandra sees brightest supernova ever

The brightest stellar explosion ever recorded may be a long-sought new type of supernova, according to observations by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and ground-based optical telescopes. This discovery indicates that violent explosions of extremely massive stars were relatively common in the early universe, and that a similar explosion may be ready to go off in our own Galaxy.

"This was a truly monstrous explosion, a hundred times more energetic than a typical supernova," said Nathan Smith of the University of California at Berkeley, who led a team of astronomers from California and the University of Texas. "That means the star that exploded might have been as massive as a star can get, about 150 times that of our Sun. We've never seen that before."

Astronomers think many of the first generation of stars were this massive, and, therefore, this new supernova may provide a rare glimpse of how the first stars died. It is unprecedented, however, to find such a massive star and witness its death in the local Universe. The discovery of the supernova, known as SN 2006gy, provides evidence that the death of such massive stars is fundamentally different from theoretical predictions.

"Of all exploding stars ever observed, this was the king," said Alex Filippenko, leader of the ground-based observations at the Lick Observatory in California and the Keck Observatory in Hawaii. "We were astonished to see how bright it got, and how long it lasted."

The Chandra observation allowed the team to rule out the most likely alternative explanation for the supernova, namely that it was an explosion of a white dwarf star with a mass only slightly higher than the Sun into a dense, hydrogen-rich environment. In that event, SN 2006gy should have been 1,000 times brighter in X-rays than what Chandra detected.

"This provides strong evidence that SN 2006gy was, in fact, the death of an extremely massive star," said Dave Pooley of U.C. Berkeley who led the Chandra observations.

The star that produced SN 2006gy apparently expelled a large amount of mass prior to exploding. This eruption is similar to one seen from Eta Carinae, a massive star in our Galaxy, raising suspicion that Eta Carinae may be poised to explode as a supernova. Although SN 2006gy is intrinsically the brightest supernova ever, it is in the galaxy NGC 1260 some 240 million light years away. However, Eta Carinae is only about 7500 light years away in our own Milky Way galaxy.

"We don't know for sure if Eta Carinae will explode soon, but we had better keep a close eye on it just in case," said Mario Livio of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, who was not involved in the research. "Eta Carinae's explosion could be the best star-show in the history of modern civilization."

Supernovas usually occur when massive stars exhaust their fuel and collapse under their own gravity. In this case of SN 2006gy, astronomers think that a very different effect may have triggered the explosion. Under some conditions, the core of a massive star produces so much gamma-ray light that some of the energy from the radiation is converted into particle and anti-particle pairs. The resulting drop in energy causes the star to collapse under its own huge gravity.

After this violent collapse, runaway thermonuclear reactions ensue and the star explodes, spewing the remains into space. The SN 2006gy data suggest that spectacular supernovas from the first stars -- rather than complete collapse to a black hole -- may be more common than previously believed.

"In terms of the effect on the early Universe, there's a huge difference between these two possibilities," said Smith. "One pollutes the galaxy with large quantities of newly made elements and the other locks them up forever in a black hole."

Chandra Xray Center

May 7, 2007

Comments

Yes, that is correct. The

May 8, 2007 by Spirit (not verified), 2 years 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 23398

Yes, that is correct. The giant supernova that recently took place happened in a galaxy apx. 240 million light years away, so the event actually happened about 240 million years ago. Same with Eta Carinae....it's apx. 7500 light years away so you are correct that if we observe that it goes super nova this year it would have actually taken place 7500 years ago, give or take :)

SN 2006gy

May 8, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 years 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 23395

If SN 2006gy is 240 million light years away, and we are just now seeing the explosion, then this explosion occured some 181 million years before the dinosaurs walked the earth. Someone help me here, could there have been an event in the past that could send out distuctive radiation that could distroy the earth and we are just waiting for it to happen? God is good.

Eta Carinae

May 8, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 years 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 23368

If Eta Carinae is 7500 light years away and astronomers expect it to go into supernova anytime between now and the next 100 years, doesn't that mean it already went to supernova 7500-7600 years ago? After all any observations we make are from light that took 7500 years to reach the earth. Consequently, it would take the light from the explosion 7500 years for us to observe it, therefor Eta Carnae, in all likelihood, has already exploded.

do something....NOW!

May 7, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 years 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 23312

I dont get any of this...people say oh we're going to reduce the global warming...then people need to start freakin doing it. This isn't for just us think: 50 years down the road a million species are supposed to be extinct. I mean we are so stupid...were killing our environment by doing things we actually dont need. We dont need cars. People are probably thinking umm i have to get to work...yea. Well what did people 150 years ago do?? Oh Ill just go get in my cadillac. We cant keep doing careless things unless we want the world to be gone as we know it. Im only 15 but I KNOW THAT WE NEED TO DO SOME THING NOW ABOUT THIS GLOBAL WARMING OR EVERYONES GOING TO DIE. You might not think we need to do anything right away because it's only starting but if this lasts more than 10 more years...then its over. We lose. People need to do something or else we're all SCREWED.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.