- Topics
- Aerospace
- Animals
- Anthro and Archaeology
- Bio and Medicine
- Brain and Behavior
- Business and Economy
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Outreach
- Energy and Environment
- Geoscience
- Internet and Communication
- Media and Entertainment
- Nanotech, Chem and Materials
- Physics and Numbers
- Security and Defense
- Software
- Space
- Transportation
- Reader Blogs
- Commerce
- Register/Login
Money doesn't grow on trees, but gasoline might
Researchers have made a breakthrough in the development of "green gasoline," a liquid identical to standard gasoline yet created from sustainable biomass sources like switchgrass and poplar trees.
Reporting in the cover article of the April 7, 2008 issue of Chemistry & Sustainability, Energy & Materials (ChemSusChem), chemical engineer and National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER awardee George Huber of the University of Massachusetts-Amherst (UMass) and his graduate students Torren Carlson and Tushar Vispute announced the first direct conversion of plant cellulose into gasoline components.
In the same issue, James Dumesic and colleagues from the University of Wisconsin-Madison announce an integrated process for creating chemical components of jet fuel using a green gasoline approach. While Dumesic's group had previously demonstrated the production of jet-fuel components using separate steps, their current work shows that the steps can be integrated and run sequentially, without complex separation and purification processes between reactors.
While it may be five to 10 years before green gasoline arrives at the pump or finds its way into a fighter jet, these breakthroughs have bypassed significant hurdles to bringing green gasoline biofuels to market.
"It is likely that the future consumer will not even know that they are putting biofuels into their car," said Huber. "Biofuels in the future will most likely be similar in chemical composition to gasoline and diesel fuel used today. The challenge for chemical engineers is to efficiently produce liquid fuels from biomass while fitting into the existing infrastructure today."
For their new approach, the UMass researchers rapidly heated cellulose in the presence of solid catalysts, materials that speed up reactions without sacrificing themselves in the process. They then rapidly cooled the products to create a liquid that contains many of the compounds found in gasoline.
The entire process was completed in under two minutes using relatively moderate amounts of heat. The compounds that formed in that single step, like naphthalene and toluene, make up one fourth of the suite of chemicals found in gasoline. The liquid can be further treated to form the remaining fuel components or can be used "as is" for a high octane gasoline blend.
"Green gasoline is an attractive alternative to bioethanol since it can be used in existing engines and does not incur the 30 percent gas mileage penalty of ethanol-based flex fuel," said John Regalbuto, who directs the Catalysis and Biocatalysis Program at NSF and supported this research.
"In theory it requires much less energy to make than ethanol, giving it a smaller carbon footprint and making it cheaper to produce," Regalbuto said. "Making it from cellulose sources such as switchgrass or poplar trees grown as energy crops, or forest or agricultural residues such as wood chips or corn stover, solves the lifecycle greenhouse gas problem that has recently surfaced with corn ethanol and soy biodiesel."
Beyond academic laboratories, both small businesses and Fortune 500 petroleum refiners are pursuing green gasoline. Companies are designing ways to hybridize their existing refineries to enable petroleum products including fuels, textiles, and plastics to be made from either crude oil or biomass and the military community has shown strong interest in making jet fuel and diesel from the same sources.
"Huber's new process for the direct conversion of cellulose to gasoline aromatics is at the leading edge of the new ‘Green Gasoline' alternate energy paradigm that NSF, along with other federal agencies, is helping to promote," states Regalbuto.
Not only is the method a compact way to treat a great deal of biomass in a short time, Regalbuto emphasized that the process, in principle, does not require any external energy. "In fact, from the extra heat that will be released, you can generate electricity in addition to the biofuel," he said. "There will not be just a small carbon footprint for the process; by recovering heat and generating electricity, there won't be any footprint."
The latest pathways to produce green gasoline, green diesel and green jet fuel are found in a report sponsored by NSF, the Department of Energy and the American Chemical Society entitled "Breaking the Chemical and Engineering Barriers to Lignocellulosic Biofuels: Next Generation Hydrocarbon Biorefineries" released April 1 (http://www.ecs.umass.edu/biofuels/). In the report, Huber and a host of leaders from academia, industry and government present a plan for making green gasoline a practical solution for the impending fuel crisis.
"We are currently working on understanding the chemistry of this process and designing new catalysts and reactors for this single step technique. This fundamental chemical understanding will allow us to design more efficient processes that will accelerate the commercialization of green gasoline," Huber said.
Submitted by BJS on Mon, 2008-04-07 08:56.
- Printer-friendly version
- 4428 reads

GasBankUSA
I looked at the site at www.gasbankusa.com and it looks interesting. A good way to save on gas.
Gasbankusa does look like an interesting concept
Anyone know when this site will go live? I'm ready to save money on gas.
Cheaper Gas - Fixed Price Gasoline.
While cruising the web, I came across this site, http://www.gasbankusa.com . The site says you can buy gas at today's price and lock in if the price goes up. Interesting concept. Looks like a great idea to hedge on gasoline prices. Any savings on gasoline is good. It give's you some control when you had NONE before.
It's good to hear BP & GM
It's good to hear BP & GM talk about alternative fuels, but 50 years to implement is too long.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/05/news/companies/bigoil_hydrogen/index.htm
Perhaps this link will spark more attention:
http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/
It is GM's electric concept car the Chevy Volt. If more people begin to demand alternative fuel cars, we should be able to speed the rate at which the technology is developed.
We have started an Investor Forum where Investors can meet and discuss topics like this:
http://investor-forum.thesubway.com/
again, water's not fuel
Basic science here guys. When you "burn" water, what are the waste products, hmmm? Are they, um, water? So let me see. I'm going to take water, do something magic to it--say split it into hydrogen and oxygen, and never mind where I get the energy to do that-- and then burn the hydrogen which combines with oxygen in the air to form water and release heat.
Yes, the hydrogen released from water can be burned (to form water again). Hydrogen really is the fuel and water is the product created when it is burned. Basic laws of thermo require that you cannot just make energy out of nothing. So you will never get more energy out of the hydrogen produced from water than what it took to create the hydrogen in the first place.
Water is not in any way possible a fuel. It never can be a source of fuel. Any device that uses a car battery / energy from the car's alternator (converts car's mechanical energy to electrical to recharge battery) will only be converting energy that originally came from the car's gasoline. Thus using such a system not only will not provide net energy in fuel, the conversion process cannot be 100% efficient due to thermodynamics laws and therefore will result in a loss of fuel economy.
Water as fuel !!
I find this discussion about gasoline and its alternatives little amusing. Well, water is not fuel in its own right, but the hydrogen which is generated by electrolysis of water using batteris can serve as a fuel. This fact is even reported by Scientfic American in the following post
http://www.pbs.org/saf/1403/teaching/teaching4.htm
And, the site about 'Water Fuelled Cars' is based on the same principle.
What if...
If we use all the bio waste such as dead grass, leaves, dead wood, etc for fuel making, would that mean there would nothing for the soil to replenish itself on? Doesn't soil get nutrients from dead and dying biomass? If we suddenly take all of this to make fuel, would we be hurting ourselves in a different way?
Just asking.
Water is not a fuel
Green gasoline sounds like it has potential, but water is not in any way a fuel. Extracting energy from water takes more energy, and the idea that it produces a fuel 3x more potent than gasoline is completely absurd. That site is pitching nothing but snake oil.
Gasoline Alternatives
It is good to know that researchers have made some breakthrough in developing green alternatives to Gasoline. There are some researchers who also have become succesful in running normal gasoline based cars on ordinary water. The site Water Fuelled Cars covers this research about water fuelled hybrid cars in detail.
Post new comment