Skip to content

Meta-study finds God answers prayers

Does God or some other type of transcendent entity answer prayer?

The answer, according to a new Arizona State University study published in the March journal Research on Social Work Practice, is “yes.” David R. Hodge, an assistant professor of social work in the College of Human Services at Arizona State University, conducted a comprehensive analysis of 17 major studies on the effects of intercessory prayer – or prayer that is offered for the benefit of another person – among people with psychological or medical problems. He found a positive effect.

“There have been a number of studies on intercessory prayer, or prayer offered for the benefit of another person,” said Hodge, a leading expert on spirituality and religion. “Some have found positive results for prayer. Others have found no effect. Conducting a meta-analysis takes into account the entire body of empirical research on intercessory prayer. Using this procedure, we find that prayer offered on behalf of another yields positive results.”

Hodge’s work is featured in the March, 2007, issue of Research on Social Work Practice, a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research on practice outcomes. It is widely recognized as one of the most prestigious journals in the field of social work.

Hodge noted that his study is important because it is a compilation of available studies and is not a single work with a single conclusion. His “Systematic Review” takes into account the findings of 17 studies that used intercessory prayer as a treatment in practice settings.

“Some people feel Benson and associates’ study from last year, which is the most recent and showed no positive effects for intercessory prayer, is the final word,” said Hodge, referring to a 2006 article by Dr. Herbert Benson of the Harvard Medical School that measured the therapeutic effect of intercessory prayer in cardiac bypass patients. “But, this research suggests otherwise. This study enables us to look at the big picture. When the effects of prayer are averaged across all 17 studies, controlling for differences in sample sizes, a net positive effect for the prayer group is produced.

“This is the most thorough and all-inclusive study of its kind on this controversial subject that I am aware of,” said Hodge. “It suggests that more research on the topic may be warranted, and that praying for people with psychological or medical problems may help them recover.”

The use of prayer as a therapeutic intervention is controversial. Yet, Hodge notes that survey research indicates that many people use intercessory prayer as an intervention to aid healing, which raises questions about its effectiveness as an intervention strategy.

“Overall, the meta-analysis indicates that prayer is effective. Is it effective enough to meet the standards of the American Psychological Association’s Division 12 for empirically validated interventions? No. Thus, we should not be treating clients suffering with depression, for example, only with prayer. To treat depression, standard treatments, such as cognitive therapy, should be used as the primary method of treatment.”

In addition to his inclusion in the upcoming issue of Research on Social Work Practice, Hodge is widely published and has appeared on the pages of Social Work, Social Work Research, Journal of Social Service Research, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, and Families in Society. He has also authored the book “Spiritual assessment: A handbook for helping professionals.”

Source Arizona State University

March 14, 2007

Comments

Should be titled: Meta-study proves Pandeism

April 9, 2009 by Anonymous, 12 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 35970

Interesting fact from this "study": the people praying were just as likely to have their prayers "answered" if they prayed to Allah, Jesus, Jehovah, or Buddha.... which is not what you would predict if any of these individual faiths were true, but only if Pandeism were true -- that is, only if the Universe itself was "God" and the persons doing the praying were not reaching an external God, but tapping their own internal, inherent godliness!!

Meta -study: humility and confidence

January 31, 2009 by Anonymous, 22 weeks 40 min ago
Comment id: 34142

Johnson Srigiri
mjjsrigiri@yahoo.com

'If you fully understand it, it is not God,' said Augustine of Hippo. Even if there is going to be a day that supersedes the apparatus of Meta-studies, to study and to ascertain with the help of any empirical study, all that happens between God and us-humans, will remain wanting. However, all those who make 'gods' out of their fields of study, probably need humility to know that everything in reality cannot be grasped, understood and controlled by their 'understanding,' but each one of us stand under God who is beyond all human grasp and whose response to prayer neither need the affirmation of any field of science nor the effects of prayers to Him can be analyzed.

Meta-Study finds God answers prayers?

September 26, 2008 by Anonymous, 40 weeks 17 hours ago
Comment id: 32162

A meta-study isn't a physical research project; it is essentially a review of numerous research studies on a particular topic.

Therefore a meta-study is only as reliable as the research studies it summarizes.

There has NEVER been a study that passes scientific muster (randomized/placebo-controlled/double-blind) which showed any healing effect of prayer.

There have been studies that claimed to do so, even one posted for two years on Columbia University's website. However, they have been proven to be FRAUDULENT studies. That is, the authors LIED. The authors now are in jail, dead, or under investigation.

So a meta-study that says "a comprehensive analysis of 17 major studies on the effects of intercessory prayer" found a "positive effect" is completely false, if those 17 studies were false.

and they were.

zENVlhCsuXRcJzjsVZp

May 26, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 5 weeks ago
Comment id: 30123

my girl crazy, man!

the science of prayer science

March 9, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 28028

I reviewed the science of prayer science at
www.scrolling.blogs.com/drmetablog/2006/04/prayer_science.html

Look, more Christian super science!

September 4, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 43 weeks ago
Comment id: 24799

Better watch out guys! The super Christians scientists are going to prove god's real any day now. Repent or fail your biology class!

The Power of Prayer Proves Nothing

July 23, 2007 by Cal-Trek (not verified), 1 year 49 weeks ago
Comment id: 24319

Suppose, hypothetically, that there were a positive effect resulting from prayer. This is just as likely prove that some of the people doing the praying have some kind of telekinetic healing power as it is to prove the intercession of a responsive God. A test of this would be to have prayers offered to incompatible Gods, one group to Allah, another to Jesus, another to Buddha, another to Zeus maybe, perhaps even prayers to the inactive God underlying Deism and Pandeism. Have the subjects of these prayers equally dispersed among Christians, Muslims, Pandeists, Deists, Buddhists, ...um... Zeusists? See if Muslims heal faster when Allah is prayed to for them (or if they are led to believe that prayers to Allah are made to them). See if Pandeists have any response when they think the inactive fabric of the Universe that underscores Pandeism is prayed to (not likely).

Actually, that would be an interesting experiment as well -- just tell people they're being prayed for and see if those receiving the prayers react differently from those misled to believe they are receiving the prayers!

Bad science, take a closer look.

April 23, 2007 by skeptigirl, 2 years 10 weeks ago
Comment id: 21993

I went to a lot of trouble to look at that meta-analysis on the effects of prayer. The included studies were either poorly done, not blinded let alone double blinded, sample sizes of 10 give or take a few, claimed conclusions not supported by the evidence, and there was self selected bias in the meta-analysis not addressed. You can read the specific issues in this thread, Meta-Analysis Indicates Prayer Effective, on the JREF forum.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=77095&highlight=answers+prayers

The thread is short and includes very specific criticisms of each study included in the meta-analysis. Needless to say, it's unfortunate such a poorly done analysis was included in a peer reviewed publication. The authors apparently made no effort to include only valid studies and/or conclusions. Even if any of the studies had revealed true positive results, the reviewers missed the most obvious, science 101, glaring error. If you do the end math and you have 10 studies with no effect and 1 study with an effect, what will your analysis show? A positive effect! They counted "no effect" as zero rather than a negative number.

Here we have more fodder for the cannons of the wishful thinkers who prefer fake/bad science which supports their beliefs rather than looking at what the evidence actually shows. And naturally, a review of this meta-analysis which is critical of it is tagged with the usual false premise, science has a bias against religion.

No, science isn't biased against religion, it is biased against bad science.

If God Asnwers Prayers

April 7, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 12 weeks ago
Comment id: 20336

Why not just skip the Office Visit? Stay home and stay on your knees. Who needs science when you have the gods?

Informed Criticism?

April 7, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 12 weeks ago
Comment id: 20326

So when religious believers publish results, they're biased; but when non-believers do, they're not?

Partnership with Medicine

March 20, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 15 weeks ago
Comment id: 19209

The physicians, nurses and therapists in my area work with me in a partnership for healing. They do not fear my intercessory prayer for patients any more than I fear surgical and/or medicinal intervention. I continue to marvel at the potential of modern medicine, while marvelling at God's handiwork as He answers fervent effective prayers.

prayer for patients

March 17, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 15 weeks ago
Comment id: 19007

Meta studies are notorious for being used to put a spin on data.
Check the original studies. Look up Meta Studies and how they are used.
Mr. Hodge is also a bit biased as he is published by "North American Association of Christians in Social Work" www.nacsw.org
This is a "Science" blog, right?

Origin of the title

March 16, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 15 weeks ago
Comment id: 18870

"To the man who himself strives earnestly, God also lends a helping hand. "
Aeschylus

What a load of B.S.

March 15, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18839

When the first study ,that was ran and funded by Christians no less, proved that prayer had ZERO effect on changing outcomes (wich should come as no suprise to those of us with common sense ) they had to rig another one to get the answer they wanted. Once again here we have a case of manipulating the science to get the desired answer (in wich case it is NOT science at all). This kind of crap infuriates me because the media wil run the story with the type of sensationalist headline like the one in the above article, and the moronic geberal public will eat it up as proof that their imaginary god exists and actually listens to them.
The above "study" is just more ill-constructed psuedo-science.

Alex Gorstan

March 15, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18833

Did the patients know they were being prayed for? Were the patients being prayed for by close family and friends, or a random group of people to which they had no association? I think these are all important questions. If no one prayed for an individual in the non-prayer group because s/he was an atheist with atheist friends, perhaps they felt more stressed as their condition was out of their hands and up to chance and medicine alone. The stress thus causing a negative health impact.

Praise The MAN

March 15, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18825

My automatic reaction to this is to try and pic holes in the methods those social scientists used to aquire this sort of 'scientificaly hereditary' result, quite right: pacebo effect; predisposition and so on.
The correct way to aproach this would be to say we are observing an effect, an effect which stems from people concentrating hard on a particular issue that they really really want to happen, accessing some part of their mind where they bring themselves into the state when they are being completely honest with some sort of imaginary 'fatherly' figure with whom there is no secrects; repent the 'bad things', ask for the good thing(s) and, it seems, things go better than if you would not have done nothing at all.
I don't know about you but from where I come from I would bemaybe the second generation that does not believe in 'supernatural being(s)', following a good few tens of thousands that did. to think that we do not carry some sort biologicaly (or whatever) inherited legacy is foolish.
There are countless examples why beleif in the 'supernatural' would have been useful for our susvival in the past and the evolution of inteligence in humans.
It is as simple as that: we have religiuos practices and beleifs because they were useful for our survival, we've inherited it. My whole point is what is that It? How is it that we can tap into sort of grid with our minds just by thinking in a particular way and influece outcomes? Is it some sort of group system of survival that we are calling God because that is the only way we can tap into it?
Any thoughts?

AAAS Again

March 15, 2007 by Dov Henis, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18824

Dov Henis
I suggest that psychology schmycology, HU or ASU, meta- or BS- study, this kind of politically-correct non-subversive pseudosophisticated-BS verbiage and attitude re an obvious matter of psychiatry is another consequence of the mentality/stand represented and apostled by the AAAS, the American Association for AntiScientism.

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=286

Meh

March 14, 2007 by belg4mit, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18805

I don't see no world peace. HIV is still with us, etc. etc. Given the medical context, I wonder how much the placebo effect comes into sway?

Meta-study finds God answers prayers

March 14, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 18801

This was a lousy story because it gave no data or support for the title.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.