Massive California fires consistent with climate change
The catastrophic fires that are sweeping Southern California are consistent with what climate change models have been predicting for years, experts say, and they may be just a prelude to many more such events in the future – as vegetation grows heavier than usual and then ignites during prolonged drought periods.
“This is exactly what we’ve been projecting to happen, both in short-term fire forecasts for this year and the longer term patterns that can be linked to global climate change,” said Ronald Neilson, a professor at Oregon State University and bioclimatologist with the USDA Forest Service.
“You can’t look at one event such as this and say with certainty that it was caused by a changing climate,” said Neilson, who was also a contributor to publications of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a co-recipient earlier this month of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
“But things just like this are consistent with what the latest modeling shows,” Neilson said, “and may be another piece of evidence that climate change is a reality, one with serious effects.”
The latest models, Neilson said, suggest that parts of the United States may be experiencing longer-term precipitation patterns – less year-to-year variability, but rather several wet years in a row followed by several that are drier than normal.
“As the planet warms, more water is getting evaporated from the oceans and all that water has to come down somewhere as precipitation,” said Neilson. “That can lead, at times, to heavier vegetation loads popping up and creation of a tremendous fuel load. But the warmth and other climatic forces are also going to create periodic droughts. If you get an ignition source during these periods, the fires can just become explosive.”
The problems can be compounded, Neilson said, by El Niño or La Nina events. A La Niña episode that’s currently under way is probably amplifying the Southern California drought, he said. But when rains return for a period of years, the burned vegetation may inevitably re-grow to very dense levels.
“In the future, catastrophic fires such as those going on now in California may simply be a normal part of the landscape,” said Neilson.
Fire forecast models developed by Neilson’s research group at OSU and the Forest Service rely on several global climate models. When combined, they accurately predicted both the Southern California fires that are happening and the drought that has recently hit parts of the Southeast, including Georgia and Florida, causing crippling water shortages.
In studies released five years ago, Neilson and other OSU researchers predicted that the American West could become both warmer and wetter in the coming century, conditions that would lead to repeated, catastrophic fires larger than any in recent history.
At that time, the scientists suggested that periodic increases in precipitation, in combination with higher temperatures and rising carbon dioxide levels, would spur vegetation growth and add even further to existing fuel loads caused by decades of fire suppression.
Droughts or heat waves, the researchers said in 2002, would then lead to levels of wildfire larger than most observed since European settlement. The projections were based on various “general circulation” models that showed both global warming and precipitation increases during the 21st century.


Actual statistics?
I like this "actual statistics" rebuff, but providing no reference to back up. I guess if you pretend there isn't a problem, well then you don't have to do anything about it (or you don't have to worry your conscience about not being able to do anything about it, if that is indeed the case, since we may very well be late to the dinner table on this one folks).
I just wish we'd all wake up, and realize that anything short of a complete elimination of fossil fuel burn will result in the continuing course of climate change we are seeing today, and those forecasted in the not-too-distant future.
Steph
Cali fires
Come on. You know, my sink is clogged. I think it's global warming.
The other comments have more than adequately pointed out that a flawed land management policy is largely to blame. But there is also the issue of arson here. The fires are burning in an area that is largely chaparral. It is naturally dry, thick, and prone to burning. Particularly when idiots set matches to it. This would be true regardless of whether there was global warming.
California Fires
If these fires are a result of more vegetation than the normal amount,
Then wouldn't it make since to introduce more wildlife and livestock to these areas.So it will effectivly decrease the amount of over grown grass and undergrowth.
I also believe that if loggers were able to thin out some of these forests the fire fighters would have an easier time gaining control of these fires reducing man hours,tax money and saving lives.
w.g.finch
finch_w@yahoo.com
This is just hype...
This guy is just trying to get free publicity for his modeling paper. Actual statistics show no link between Southern California wildfires and recent warming.
meh
a) It's global warming not "climate change." The latter is a technically accurate but incredibly vague and less threatening reframing by conservatives.
b) Lots of things are "consistent" with global warming. Trying to link every event on the planet to it doesn't make the case any stronger.
c) Maybe, just maybe, a century of the ill-conceived total surpression doctrine has had something to do with this conflagration?
This is just hype...
This guy is just trying to get some publicity for his modeling paper, when actual statistics for wildfires in Southern California show no link with recent warming.
Western US Fire caused by Firefighting policy
While no global warming denier, I feel that I must point out that it is probably not primarily responsible for the kind of fires we are experiencing in the western US. While climate patterns certainly effect which year is going to be worse than another, etc., the main reason why fires are so much bigger is our forest management policies have resulted in increased fuel loads. For a century, Smokey the Bear has urged us to put out every tiny little fire. But before this policy was instituted, fires were common. This meant that fuel was burned in smaller amounts, never getting the large concentrations and uninterrupted tracts of today.
The Chumash people called the area that is now the L.A. Basin, "Valley of Smoke" for the almost constant small fires that burned in the surrounding hills. When we stopped these small fires, we set the stage for the big ones of today.
Care to see for yourself? Look carefully at the NASA space photos of the smoke. Notice that there are also fires in Baja California, south of the Mexican boarder. The smoke from those fires is yellow/brown while the smoke from the US side is thicker and blue-grey/white. The line demarking the two is *exactly* on the boarder. North of the boarder, US Forest Service policies have helped set the stage by suppressing small fires for a century. South of the boarder, the Mexican government has allowed most of the fires to burn as they did before Europeans ever saw these shores.
We have to change our fire management policy.
--Candice H. Brown Elliott
Post new comment