- Topics
- Aerospace
- Animals
- Anthro and Archaeology
- Bio and Medicine
- Brain and Behavior
- Business and Economy
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Outreach
- Energy and Environment
- Geoscience
- Internet and Communication
- Media and Entertainment
- Nanotech, Chem and Materials
- Physics and Numbers
- Security and Defense
- Software
- Space
- Transportation
- Reader Blogs
- Commerce
- Register/Login
I Am Galileo In The 21st Century

know my result is correct over 99% possibility!
http://www.truthmost.com
Therefore, I am Galileo in the 21st century. The calculation of the possibility is simple:
1. There is the result proved over 80-years: galaxy disk brightness decreases exponentially in radial direction.
2. What is the curve on the disk so that the directional derivative of light density in the perpendicular direction to the curve is constant along the curve (i.e., the ratio of star densities (light densities) on both sides of the curve is constant along the curve)??
3. The answer is the logarithmatic curves!!
4. Normal-spiral-galaxy arms are logarithmatic curves!!
5. The curves can be derived by complex exponential function z=exp(w)
6. How many analytical types of orthoganal curves approach the exponential function?
7. Only two. The above logarithmic curve is one. The other type gives galaxy bars!!
8. In far distance from the galaxy center, does the bar brightness approach the disk one? If it did then my result would fail because we could not distinguish between bar and disk in the far distance from the galaxy center.
9. It is amazing that the bar brightness does not approach the disk one (astro-ph/0510535):
We have exponential disk ( exp(-r) ) but we have cubic-exponential bar ( exp(-r^3) ). This is a miracle!!!!!!
10. My model fits 9 real galaxy images very well (see my computer software ($3.80))!!
11. My model fits elliptical galaxies both theoretically and in numerical fitting (astro-ph/0510536).
Therefore, I am Galileo in the 21st century. But I do not know how to spend the rest of my life, and I look for your suggestion.
Quote from Max Planck (the father of Quantum Mechanics):
"An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul. What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out, and that the growing generation is familiarised with the ideas from the beginning.''
Submitted by truthmost.com on Sun, 2008-05-04 10:43.
- truthmost.com's blog
- Printer-friendly version
- 769 reads

deparments are closing doors.
'Bad artists copy. Good artists steal.'Picasso
who is Galileo ,,, I will share my level of ?Galileo ,,,WOW,but look ,,,,,,Very early in my life I took the question of the relation of art to truth seriously: even now I stand in holy dread in the face of this discordance. My first book was devoted to it. The Birth of Tragedy believes in art on the background of another belief – that it is not possible to live with truth, that the “will to truth” is already a symptom of degeneration.
Engrave this quote in Our Store! | Rate this Quote! | Tell a Friend
-Friedrich Nietzsche
this mean,whe are needing our enemy,our know t,
no,because imagine,better to be on the center,,m,
the fact Galileo ,really do not know each other <<,
Nietzsche,just FIT.Phil<>
Gadfly,
Gadfly,
You consider the following facts are insults?
1. Almost half of math faculty members in USA research univs are asians;
2. Almost half of Med & Bio labs staff are asians;
3. You everyday sing: how beautiful the mainstream physics theory is! Do you know physics has to change or progress? You can not make a living with the eulogy to old theory. Kids will not listen to you? Why?
4. Why? I tell you the truth about life & directional derivative from
http://www.truthmost.com
LIFE is change. CHANGE is described by DERIVATIVE.
Now you learned the lesson.
It is not an insult. It is a basic math. Unfortunately, lots of professors in USA prestigious univs do not know the lesson. That is why PHYSICS deparments are closing doors.
I can sense that GRAVITY PROBE B staff suffer tremendous suppresion from those powerful who even do not know DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE!
Sorry, indeed!
Jin He's continuing insults are the sorriest excuse for scientific discourse I have seen in a long time.
I'd bite his pompous behind, except I'm afraid his venom would poison even a gadfly.
Ugh!
This bite of realism brought to you by "Gadfly."
Sorry,
Mr. Fred Bortz,
Sorry, I know you are a Dr.
Sorry, you did not report to me what is Directional Derivative!!
Sorry, You do not know DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE although you are an American scientific Dr.
Sorry, it is not an insult. It is an American truth!!!
Sorry, if your books have slow sale, try to write a book on looking for new Galileo!
Why the insults, Jin He?
Jin He,
I am responding once, and only once, to defend myself against your insults.
I submit my writings to editorial scrutiny, and I do not insult people who offer advice. Unlike you, I am not so self-absorbed or arrogant as to claim to be the next Carl Sagan, though I think my work is quite good.
I tried to offer helpful suggestions, and all you did was insult me.
What are we to make of that? I have a few choice adjectives in mind, but I'll allow others to decide for themselves.
Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)
It is me Jin He
You Fred Bortz THE Science and technology books for young readers,
You dare to tell me what is DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE within one minutes? Otherwise I know you try to copy something from somewhere which you never understand as you do to young readers, which makes American children tardy in math.
To "truthmost"
Truthmost, the more you post, the more you prove Gadfly's point. I assume that you are Jin He, who has posted things like this before.
I suggest you follow the link to the Galileo Complex post and take Renaisauce's comments to heart. They do indeed apply to you. Of course, one of the hallmarks of the syndrome is that the sufferer can't recognize his/her own affliction.
I'm not saying you are a fool, but I'm sure you know that the people who are most foolish are those who do not recognize the foolhardiness that others see in them.
Have you tried to publish your work in peer reviewed journals? If it has been rejected there, have you received any constructive criticism?
You had some excellent advice in an earlier thread about how to subject your claims to the kind of scrutiny that might support them. Unfortunately, rather than following that advice, you seem to be peddling your uncertified software and hoping people will both buy the product and accept your outrageous claim of being a lone genius.
There has never been a lone genius. Even path-breakers like Einstein, Newton, and Galileo presented their work to people who were capable of evaluating it. Their acclaim came because of the clear originality and quality of their work, not because they stood up and announced, "See how brilliant I am." Sure, their ideas had critics, but they also had supporters. And it was the ideas themselves, not any claims of brilliance by their creators, that led to their success.
Subject your work to criticism and, if it is indeed the brilliant breakthrough you think it is, others will recognize its genius. If that happens, you may be acclaimed a Galileo for the 21st Century. But right now you look like one of many people who delude themselves and are unwilling to probe the limitations of their work.
This will be the last I have to say about this or any future postings of yours until your Galileo Complex is cured.
Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)
I Am Galileo In The 21st Century
Great advice and I am learning all the time.
---------------
nethmi
Wow, check out this site called http://www.fluc.com
. Free SMS and free mobile ads!! Its fantastic
More to Mr. or Ms Gadfly,
Mr. or Ms Gadfly,
Now you understand why Bill Gates everyday prays for more immigrants and more quota of immigrant visas. There are too many USA citizens who make their living by singing `Galileo Complex` everyday!!!!!!!
They lose both laboral and inteligent abilities!
Mr. or Ms Gadfly,
According to your low-brain logic, there would be no more Galileo. You dont believe any more Galileo, either you are very common people or you serve some purpose of mainstream.
You everyday sing the song of "Galileo Complex", how much you earn everyday?
Do you know `Directional Derivative`? No? That is OK. There are lots of professors in USA prestigious Univs who do not know DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE except those new immigrants!!!!!!!!
I love USA. I hope USA is powerful forever. But there are too many people in USA who sing "Galileo Complex". It is pitiful for USA.
To paraphrase VP candidate Lloyd Bentsen vs. Dan Quayle, 1988
I knew Galileo. Galileo was a friend of mine. Truthmost, you are no Galileo.
(Though I must admit you are a fine example of the Galileo Complex)
This bite of realism brought to you by "Gadfly."
Post new comment