Follow us on 



HIV's path out of Africa: Haiti, the US then the world

29 Oct 2007

Anonymous's picture

The AIDS virus entered the United States via Haiti, probably arriving in just one person in about 1969, earlier than previously believed, according to new research.

After the virus, HIV-1, entered the U.S., it flourished and spread worldwide.

"Our results show that the strain of virus that spawned the U.S. AIDS epidemic probably arrived in or around 1969. That is earlier than a lot of people had imagined," said senior author Michael Worobey.

The research is the first to definitively pinpoint when and from where HIV-1 entered the United States and shows that most HIV/AIDS viruses in the U.S. descended from a single common ancestor. The actual ancestral HIV entered the U.S. long before the storied "Patient Zero," Worobey said.

"Haiti was the stepping stone the virus took when it left central Africa and started its sweep around the world," said Worobey, an assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at The University of Arizona in Tucson. "Once the virus got to the U.S., then it just moved explosively around the world."

The strain that migrated to the U.S. in 1969, HIV-1 group M subtype B, is the first human immunodeficiency virus discovered. It is the dominant strain of the AIDS virus in most countries outside sub-Saharan Africa. Almost all the viruses in those countries descended from the one that emerged from Haiti, he said.

Worobey and his colleagues figured out when HIV reached the U.S. by conducting genetic analyses of archived blood samples from early AIDS patients.

Learning more about the genetic make-up of the various strains of HIV could help vaccine development, Worobey said.

The scientists' research paper, "The emergence of HIV/AIDS in the Americas and beyond," is scheduled for publication in the online Early Online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the week of October 29.

Worobey's co-authors are M. Thomas P. Gilbert of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark; Andrew Rambaut of the University of Edinburgh in Scotland; Gabriela Wlasiuk of the UA; Thomas J. Spira of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga.; and Arthur E. Pitchenik of the University of Miami in Fla. The National Institutes of Health, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and a University Research Fellowship from The Royal Society funded the research.

Figuring out which path HIV/AIDS took as it began its world travels and when it moved from one country to another has long been a topic of scientific investigation and debate.

Worobey and his colleagues tackled the problem by using archived blood samples from AIDS patients to construct genetic family trees for HIV.

The team analyzed blood from five of the first AIDS patients identified in the U.S., all of whom were recent immigrants from Haiti. The team also analyzed genetic sequences from another 117 AIDS patients from around the world who were infected with subtype B, the virus strain that has spread most widely.

Once all the sequences were assembled, the researchers loaded the data into a computer and used Bayesian statistics to investigate all the family trees that were consistent with the genetic data. The researchers then evaluated all possible HIV family trees to determine how probable a particular family tree is.

For the hypothesis that, from Africa, HIV went to the U.S. first, the probability is 0.003 percent -- virtually nil.

For the hypothesis that HIV went from Africa first to Haiti and then on to the U.S., the probability is 99.8 percent, almost 100 percent.

The analysis also shows that the ancestry of most viruses in the U.S. can be traced back to one common ancestor -- the virus that came from Haiti in about 1969.

"Before this study, that had not been nailed down," Worobey said.

The research also reveals that Haiti has a much larger genetic diversity of subtype B than does the U.S.

"The U.S., Australia, Europe plus many countries have just a subset of the subtype B diversity you see in Haiti," Worobey said.

The virus moved from Africa to Haiti in about 1966, he said. Haiti has more diversity of HIV than does the U.S. and other countries because the virus has been there longer and had more time to mutate.

The finding helps explain the early observations of a high prevalence of AIDS in Haiti, Worobey said. "The virus had simply been there longer."

"The main challenge of developing a vaccine against HIV is its tremendous genetic diversity," he said.

Knowing the gamut of diversity within subtype B could be important for effectively developing and testing vaccines that will work in Haiti, Worobey said.

Worobey's next step is following the trail of HIV even further back in time using older archival samples.

http://uanews.org

29 Oct 2007
Share |

Anonymous's picture

HIV + Guilt = Silly comments

So now we have three comments, supposedly from three different people, though they have the same basic comment, all implying that science has been misused to "blame" a given nationality.

The science of the original article is never once addressed in the comments above. Nor were was it discussed in the link referenced by the second commentor. All three instead use invective to cast dispersion on the motives of the scientists and finally on this website.

First, the science and the evidence does indeed suggest that HIV first evolved in Africa. Second, it happens that Haiti does have a greater range of HIV DNA sequences found in the human population. When *any* virus is found in a population, the range of nucleotide sequences is usually interpreted (based on solid theory and corrobarating observation) to mean that the virus has been in a population mutating for a time. The greater the divergence from one another, the greater the time that the virus has been in that population. Thus, if we find that the range of nucluotide sequences is greater in one population than another, we may safely conclude that it has been spreading in the first population longer than the second. Further, if the range of the nucleotide sequences found in the second population is a subset of the first, then we may also surmise that it came from that first population.

This is science. This is evidence. This is not "racism", "imperialism", etc.

This then begs the question, "Why are these commentors making these ugly assertions?"

Science is morally neutral. Epidemiology is morally neutral. But HIV, being primarily transmitted by sex or reuse of needles by drug users, is viewed by some people as being a marker of moral behavior. The commentors seem to hold such a view... and feel that any science that points to the Haitian people as having been infected first and longer than their neighbors, have a misplaced sense of internalized and externalized guilt and anger. Further, from some comments about the colonial victimization, they wish to view this in a political, as well as moral, light...

... while seeking to evoke a sense of moral guilt in the scientists and the editors of this blogsite.

The commentors are wrong, both on scientific and on moral grounds. The evidence is what it is, and trying to suppress that knowledge through invective or guilt mongering is reprehensible. I invite the commentors to examine their own motives and misplaced values. Having a disease is *not* a moral question... and silencing the truth will not absolve your own misplaced feelings of guilt or anger.

--Candice H. Brown Elliott



Anonymous's picture

Haiti is being blamed for HIV

Sir/Madame,
Regarding that article "HIV entered U.S. from Haiti as early as '69: study" that your organization published on October 30, 2007. This study cannot be more absurd. Supposedly some Haitians went to Africa in the 1960's and brought back the HIV virus to Haiti, then to the USA and eventually the world. Think about this for a minute. You should be ashamed if you allowed yourself to believe such story. By publishing this article you are helping to spread a lie and an injustice to the Haitian people.

Thousands of Europeans colonialists has been in Africa for at least the past 200 years and for some Godly reason they didn't catch that HIV virus that was supposedly floating around. Supposedly a handful of Haitians that went to Africa for a period of 10 years to help out were able to get infected with HIV and transported it back to their country and eventually the world. Those scientists are insulting your intelligence and the rest of the world's intelligence with such a ridiculous claim. This study is biased, racist, self-serving and is a shame that science is being used in such a way. How many times scientific findings that were once believed to be true were later proven wrong? Please remove this article from your website and stop helping to distribute an unfounded claim. How would that make you feel if an inaccurate story was being spread around about your family members or your fellow countrymen/women? Please let's be responsible and do the right thing. Thank you.

Sincerely,
J



Anonymous's picture

Dispelling the Haiti HIV link myth

The extent to which this story is being reported in the media as a matter of absolute truth is misleading. Haitians are the victims of AIDS as is the rest of the world. The renewed attention given to this baseless argument can only serve the purposes of a small group of people not interested in science or in increasing the freedoms of Haitians for that matter. For more compelling arguments against the research and view presented by Worobey and his team, follow this link

at http://dread-iditations.blog.co.uk/

Djindi



Anonymous's picture

Stop passing blame to others.

This just another garbage work by morons. These morons love passing blame to others. The scientist didn't research the many American who were going to Haiti to exploit the poor. Most likely these deceases came from the US to Haiti. To say that many Africans came to Haiti in the 1960s during the Dictatorship of Papa Doc is a joke. Haiti had more American, European tourists who were exploiting the poor and bringing their germs to this little country.

__________________________________________________

HIV dating/support/blog/personals--http://www.pozgroup.com


Post new comment






About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.