Skip to main content

For gravitational wave doubters

April 29, 2008 by Fred Bortz

Fred Bortz's picture

This news release from the Max Planck Institute describes evidence that supports the existence of gravitational waves, which at least one blogger here has insisted do not exist.

Contact:
Dr. Mona Clerico
Press Officer
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
and Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics
Phone +49 89 30000-3980
Email: clerico@mpe.mpg.de

Dr. Stefanie Komossa
Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics
Phone +49 89 30000-3577
Email: skomossa@mpe.mpg.de
Picture at http://www.mpe.mpg.de/news.html#1.

Superkick: Black hole expelled from its parent galaxy

Gravitational rocket propelled the monster at a speed of thousands of kilometres per second

By an enormous burst of gravitational waves that accompanies the merger of two black holes the newly formed black hole was ejected from its galaxy. This extreme ejection event, which had been predicted by theorists, has now been observed in nature for the first time. The team led by Stefanie Komossa from the Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics (MPE) thereby opened a new window into
observational astrophysics. The discovery will have far-reaching consequences for our understanding of galaxy formation and evolution in the early Universe, and also provides observational confirmation of a key prediction from the General Theory of Relativity (Astrophysical Journal Letters, May 10, 2008).

When two black holes merge, waves of gravitational radiation ripple outward through the galaxy at the speed of light. Because the waves are emitted mainly in one direction, the black hole itself is pushed in the opposite direction, much like the recoil that accompanies the firing of a rifle or the launching of a rocket. The black hole is booted from its normal location in the nucleus of the galaxy. If the kick velocity is high enough, the black hole can escape the galaxy completely.

The MPE team's discovery verifies, for the first time, that these extreme events actually occur; up to now they had only been simulated in supercomputers. The recoiling black hole caught the astrophysicists' attention by its high speed – 2650 km/s – which was measured via the broad emission lines of gas around the black hole. At this speed, one could travel from New York to Los Angeles in just under two seconds. Because of the tremendous power of the recoil the black hole, which has a mass of several 100 millions solar masses, was catapulted from the core of its parent galaxy.

In addition to the emission lines from gas bound to the recoiling black hole, the astronomers were also struck by a remarkably narrow set of emission lines originating from gas left behind in the galaxy. This gas has been excited by radiation from the recoiling black hole.

Gas that moves with the black hole – the so-called accretion disk gas – continues to "feed" the recoiling black hole for millions of years. In the process of being accreted, this gas shines in X-rays. In fact the team around Komossa also detected this X-ray emission from the disk around the black hole at a distance of 10 billion light years: by chance the region was scanned by the satellite ROSAT, and at the extreme end of the visual field an X-ray source was discovered the position of which corresponds with the distant galaxy.

The new discovery is also important because it indirectly proves that black holes do in fact merge and that the mergers are sometimes accompanied by large kicks. This process had been postulated by theory, but never before confirmed via direct observation. Another implication of the discovery is that there must be galaxies without black holes in their nuclei – as well as black holes which float forever in space between the galaxies. This raises new questions for the scientists: Did galaxies and black holes form and evolve jointly in the early Universe? Or was there a population of galaxies which had been deprived of their central black holes? And if so, how was the evolution of these galaxies different from that of galaxies that retained their black holes?

In a close interplay between theory and observation, the astrophysicists prepare to answer these questions. Various detectors on earth and in space, for example the space interferometer LISA, will be set on the track of gravitational waves. The discovery of the MPE team will provide new impetus for theorists to develop more detailed models of the superkicks and their consequences for the evolution of black holes and galaxies.

Original paper:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/588656
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/arXiv:0804.4585

Comments

Potentially even more stringent indirect evidence for GWs

May 1, 2008 by Halliday, 1 year 29 weeks ago
Comment: 29512

Fred:

A potentially even more stringent indirect evidence for Gravitational Waves (GWs) is given by OJ 287. See http://www.caha.es/18-billions-of-suns-support-einstein_en.html.

David

existence of gravitational waves

April 30, 2008 by philippe martin, 1 year 29 weeks ago
Comment: 29505

Hi,Burt Jordaan,
COBBE,Fourier analysis give us some decoding ,,COBBE fluctuation on a large scale IRRAS:(eV0).3%,if breaking the basic code on density fluctuation,and using Fourier math tech ,The second step will be adjusting this so used and abused zero and get finally to a pure trig as the first step,to establish a tan.
It is good to exchange with you,Truly Philippe martin.

Certainly not the final word on gravitational waves

April 30, 2008 by Fred Bortz, 1 year 29 weeks ago
Comment: 29500

Your comment is right on target, Burt.

The observation gives us more reason to think that the detection of gravitational waves is likely soon, but until we have an unambiguous test case that either detects or fails to detect expected gravitational waves, doubters can still make arguments that fit the data.

I also want to make clear that my use of the word "doubter" is not intended to have any positive or negative connotation. It just means that conventional theories, especially general relativity, predict that gravitational waves exist, so the doubters are challenging the convention--a perfectly reasonable and necessary activity in the context of scientific progress.

Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)

Re: For gravitational wave doubters

April 29, 2008 by Burt, 1 year 29 weeks ago
Comment: 29490

Very interesting, Fred.

I cannot help thinking that while this is strong supporting data for the existence of gravitational waves (GWs), it is not quite evidence! In the preprint the authors do concede that there are other possible explanations for the observations. Apart from the ones they mention, I also think that the dynamics of coalescence of rapidly spinning black holes may cause recoils in other ways than by pure anisotropic emission of GWs. Maybe they are observing only one of the pair being ejected from the galaxy?

With that said, I do not doubt the existence of GWs, because I think the observed binary pulsars provide very strong evidence.

Regards,

Burt Jordaan (www.Relativity-4-Engineers.com)



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.


Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes