Skip to content

Further evidence that genes help determine sexual orientation

Is sexual orientation something people are born with - like the colour of their skin and eyes - or a matter of choice?

Canadian scientists have uncovered new evidence which shows genetics has a role to play in determining whether an individual is homosexual or heterosexual.

The research was conducted by Dr. Sandra Witelson, a neuroscientist in the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University, and colleagues at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto who studied the brains of healthy, right-handed, 18- to 35-year-old homosexual and heterosexual men using structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

About 10 years ago, Witelson and Dr. Cheryl McCormick, then a student of Witelson’s, demonstrated there is a higher proportion of left-handers in the homosexual population than in the general population – a result replicated in subsequent studies which is now accepted as fact.

Handedness is a sign of how the brain is organized to represent different aspects of intelligence. Language, for example, is usually on the left - music on the right.

In other research, Witelson and research associate Debra Kigar, had found that left-handers have a larger region of the posterior corpus callosum – the thick band of nerve fibres connecting the two hemispheres of the brain – than right handers.

This raised the hypothesis for the current study – whether the anatomy of the brain of the sub-group of right-handed homosexual men is similar to that of left-handers.

They found that the posterior part of the corpus callosum is larger in homosexual than heterosexual men.

The size of the corpus callosum is largely inherited suggesting a genetic factor in sexual orientation, said Witelson “Our results do not mean that heredity is destiny but they do indicate that environment is not the only player in the field,” she said.

While this is not a litmus test for sexual orientation, Witelson said this finding could prove to be one additional valuable piece of information for physicians and individuals who are trying to determine their sexual orientation. “Sometimes people aren’t sure of their sexual orientation.”

The researchers also undertook a correlational analysis which included size of the corpus callosum, and test scores scores on language, visual spatial and finger dexterity tests. “By using all these variables, we were able to predict sexual orientation in 95 per cent of the cases,” she said.

http://www.mcmaster.ca

November 8, 2007

Comments

CEggWmWrTBzjr

May 26, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 23 weeks ago
Comment id: 30225

my girl crazy, man!

CEggWmWrTBzjr

May 26, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 23 weeks ago
Comment id: 30163

my girl crazy, man!

Why do we insist on making this issue Black and White?

November 9, 2007 by Anonymous, 1 year 52 weeks ago
Comment id: 25885

Why are we still discussing this? Why are we so insistent upon simplying every single controversial issue? Shouldn't it be remarkably easy for everyone to realize that sexuality, like *every single behavior that we partake in* is a mixture of both genetics and environment?

My love of vegetable soups is resultant of two things: growing up in a vegetable-soup-loving-family, and having taste buds that aren't repulsed by mashed vegetables. This is a pretty easy formula. But somehow, we can't do the same thing with sexuality. Because of the prideful agendas on both sides of the argument, we apparently *must* insist that homosexuality is either the product of genes, or the product of environment/choice. It's insane.

Obviously, genes have a great influence upon sexuality. But you should not discount the environment.

First of all, I used to religiously listen to Loveline, and the majority of their homosexual callers were sexually abused as a child. It's perfectly plausible to believe that childhood sexual trauma could realign a person's compass, and perhaps activate that person's 27% chance of becoming a homosexual (most people probably have much lower odds).

Second of all ... they were able to predict sexual orientation in 95% of cases? What the hell does that mean? Considering that the homosexual/bisexual population occupies about 5% of the population, their success rate isn't really thrilling me.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.