Skip to content

Dietary Choice Affects Climate More Than Food Miles

The old adage, "we are what we eat," may be the latest recipe for success when it comes to curbing the perils of global climate warming. Despite the recent popular attention to the distance that food travels from farm to plate, a.k.a. "food miles," Carnegie Mellon researchers Christopher L. Weber and H. Scott Matthews argue in an upcoming article in the prestigious Environmental Science & Technology journal that it is dietary choice, not food miles, which most determines a household's food-related climate impacts.

"Our analysis shows that despite all the attention given to food miles, the distance that food travels only accounts for around 11 percent of the average American household's food-related greenhouse gas emissions," said Weber, a research professor in Carnegie Mellon's departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering and Public Policy.

The researchers report that fruit, vegetables, meat and milk produced closer to home rack up fewer petroleum-based transport miles than foods trucked cross country to your table. Yet despite the large distances involved — the average distance traveled for food in the U.S. is estimated at 4,000-5,000 miles — the large non-energy based greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing food make food production matter much more than distance traveled.

The authors suggest that eating less red meat and/or dairy products may be a more effective way for concerned citizens to lower their food-related climate impacts. They estimate that shifting to an entirely local diet would reduce the equivalent greenhouse gas emissions as driving 1,000 miles, while changing only one day per week's meat and dairy-based calories to chicken, fish or vegetables would have about the same impact. Shifting entirely from an average American diet to a vegetable-based one would reduce the same emissions as 8,000 miles driven per year.

"Where you get your food from is a relevant factor in family food decisions, but what you are eating — and the processes needed to make it — is much more important from a climate change perspective," said Matthews, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering and engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon.

http://www.cmu.edu/news/archive/2008/April/april17_foodmiles.shtml

May 5, 2008

Comments

Bean Ban on the horizon

May 5, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 26 weeks ago
Comment id: 29648

What a fluff piece. Soon we'll be seeing a ban on beans and Mexican food if this sort of logic continues.

Did you know that the human brain produces more CO2 than any other organ in your body? We need to ban thinking and common sense before we all burn....For God sakes.... Think of the children!

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.