Skip to content

Credit cards evil by nature?

Several features of credit cards make them different from traditional forms of lending and encourage high levels of consumer debt by taking advantage of "consumers' cognitive and behavioral vulnerabilities," Adam J. Goldstein wrote in the latest issue of the University of Illinois Law Review. Goldstein is a former editor at the review who now works for a Chicago law firm.

When issuing loans for cars, home mortgages and other forms of debt, banks conduct a thorough credit screening of applicants. But when the same banks issue loans in the form of credit cards, "people with bad credit histories, as well as those who have declared bankruptcy or who have an income level that is too low to justify the credit lines that they are given, all receive high-interest credit," Goldstein wrote.

Credit-card debt also differs from more standard credit arrangements in the assessment of late fees and interest rates. This is largely a result of the National Bank Act of 1864, which exempts national banks from state consumer-protection laws that can limit the rate of interest charged to a state resident, and regulate debt-collecting and credit-reporting standards.

What's more, according to Goldstein, the marketing techniques and incentive programs used by credit-card companies induce consumers to overspend and amass debt. A 2002 medical paper described in the article links credit-card debt to various health and social problems, including insomnia, anxiety, marital breakdowns and depression.

Goldstein cited evidence that college students, inundated with direct-mail appeals by card issuers, are especially vulnerable to credit-card debt. This can lead to low grades, withdrawal from school and difficulty in finding future employment because credit checks are becoming a common feature of job applications.

The rapid increase in consumer indebtedness in the U.S. has been largely confined to credit cards and has not characterized other types of consumer credit. "This indicates that there is something singular about the design of credit cards that uniquely causes people to accumulate too much debt," Goldstein wrote.

A key principle of product liability is that the design of a product is defective and that safer alternative designs are available. A unique feature of credit cards is that "they allow debt to be incurred bit by bit, in a series of charges, none of which exceed $20 or $30 each, that can amass quickly into thousands of dollars," Goldstein noted.

In addition, by grouping payments into a single transaction every month, credit cards reduce a consumer's sensitivity to price and promote impulse buying, a fact that credit-card issuers encourage through tug-at-your-heart commercials and other advertising.

"People tend to underestimate future borrowing and correspondingly overestimate or be overly optimistic about their future ability to pay off whatever balances they may accrue," Goldstein wrote. "This causes people to be more responsive to short-term factors, such as annual fees, and less sensitive to the long-term elements of credit-card price."

Visa is the largest credit-card company, with about 1 billion cards in circulation. It is a private corporation owned by 21,000 banks, each of which issues and markets its own Visa products. The second largest issuer, MasterCard International, is an association of 22,000 member banks.

Goldstein is critical of low introductory interest rates offered to new card owners that go up dramatically after six or 18 months. "It is these high, long-term interest rates that result in faster debt growth and accelerate negative social and individual consequences of such debt," he wrote.

Between 1993 and 2000, consumer credit lines tripled from $777 billion to more than $3 trillion. The amount of credit-card debt held by Americans has grown by an equal amount, with the average adult today using six card accounts and the average household card debt conservatively estimated at $12,000.

A case of products liability could be grounded in legal theories of defective design, according to the article. One aspect of credit-card design – the minimum monthly payment feature – accelerates a consumer's overall indebtedness and benefits banks through the high interest assessed on the outstanding debt.

"Because the goal of products liability is to force manufacturers to internalize the costs associated with product risks, it follows that credit-card features that have minimum payment structures should be recognized as defects," Goldstein concluded.

His article is titled, "Why 'It Pays' to 'Leave Home Without It': Examining the Legal Culpability of Credit Card Issuers Under Tort Principles of Products Liability."

From University of Illionois - Urbana Champaign

October 27, 2006

Comments

At least milk them for all you can :)

October 8, 2008 by Anonymous, 38 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 32319

I put all my purchases on various credit cards and set calendar timers on my computer to avoid missing pay dates and getting dinged with fees. I have several cards b/c I'm always looking to get the best combo of rewards/miles/cashback. I found this site that compares credit cards based on how you spend your money each month and tells you exactly which card is best for you. Looks like I need to dump one of my cards and replace it with Chase Freedom.

Living in a Credit Poor world

March 31, 2008 by Tom Elliott (not verified), 1 year 13 weeks ago
Comment id: 28437

Predatory lending and consumer credit card debt are burying people so much that they can't dig themselves out. With the banks changing the rules when they want to, it's just too easy to get in over your head. The ezine article from David Galler about compounding economic problems in 2008 says a lot. It kind of summed it up as to how bad things really are nowadays.

Forced to use consumer credit , like it or not

March 3, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 17 weeks ago
Comment id: 27893

For many years I refused to keep a credit card because I knew without a doubt that they are inherently evil, but now I have a few cards because I was discriminated against for not having a credit history when I tried to buy homeowners' insurance a few years ago. It seems the state (FL) regulators are permitting the insurance companies to use one's credit rating as a criterion for evaluating the risk of loss on homeowners' policies, even though there's no causal relationship between the two figures. So if you don't have a record at Equifax you can't buy insurance! No matter that your retirement income is guaranteed by Uncle for the rest of your life, you own the home free and clear and likewise for your second home, and also for your business, and have plenty of other assets to boot: none of that matters if you haven't kissed Equifax's ass by keeping a consumer credit account.

Greed

February 18, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 19 weeks ago
Comment id: 27621

It is about greed. I have a friend who borowed 2k on a card to repair his home. After making regular on-time payments for over a year, Hurricane Katrina hit. They told him "we understand, you can skip your payments until January" Yet Jan. rolled around and they tagged him with interest payments and other fees on top of his regular resumed payment. The problem is, it was too much for him to handle at once. He fell behind and was bombarded with late fees and all sorts of things. He is now tagged with "broken promises" and owes nearly twice as much as he borrowed.
Adding up his payments - he has paid them over $7200.00 yet still owes them about 3k -lol- that is unbelievable.
Yes they are evil - sorry this type of usery can not be justified.

Merchant Agreements, not State or Federal Law

August 7, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 1 year 47 weeks ago
Comment id: 24476

I believe that it is not a law that merchants must charge the same price, but instead part of the agreement that the merchant signs with the card processor.

Great Read

July 10, 2007 by Steve "The Debt Settlement Man" B (not verified), 1 year 51 weeks ago
Comment id: 24172

Great article credit cards are definitely a work of the devil and can lead to many many bad things. I feel especially for college students who are out on their own for the first time and then just get bombarded with credti card offers, these card companies are setting up their victims for the long run. I really feel it would be a great help to college students to have a class offered by their high school their senior years to really educate them on debt and credit so that they do not make a huge mistake and rack up massive amounts of credit card debt while trying to get an education.

I gotta agree that credit

June 27, 2007 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 years 1 week ago
Comment id: 24067

I gotta agree that credit card companies are evil. They encourage reckless spending and offer zero help for those of us that have fallen behind on our payments. I finally sought the help of a debt relief company, creditsolutions.com, to help me reduce payments. Screw the credit card companies!!!!

All too eager - what about your blatant fraud?

January 31, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 22 weeks ago
Comment id: 16080

The anonymous writer of the "All too egar" posting is amazingly able to ignore the fact that he/she committed blatant fraud and lied on the application for credit (a legal, binding contract) but focuses on the issuer's irresponsibility for not assuming that the applicant was lying. Where is the personal responsibility in society today? Do we want to live in a society where everyone is assumed to be lying before being proved innocent? I'd love to see this person's tax return and resume.

Spend less than you make. If you don't, you're responsible for your actions. It's as simple as that.

Financial Irresponsibility - The True Problem

December 13, 2006 by cembry, 2 years 29 weeks ago
Comment id: 15177

Credit card issuers aren't necessarily "evil". But they undoubtedly take full advantage of consumers shortcomings when it comes to overspending and debt management.

Lack of discipline and financial irresponsibility are the true problems with credit cards. Pay off your card balances each and every month and never, ever, ever make a late payment. Following those 2 rules will keep you out of trouble and let you take advantage of the benefits that credit cards can offer.

cembry~
CreditCardAssist.com | Web's Leading Credit Card Resource Site

Re: Go Darwin! --> The "Non-Suckers" Maximize their Card Rewards

November 3, 2006 by Anonymous, 2 years 34 weeks ago
Comment id: 15031

Under current law, merchants are not allowed to charge a different price for an item or service when paid for by credit card than when it's paid for in cash or other means.

So the optimal behavior in the current system is to maximize one's rewards (especially cash back) by funnelling as much normal spending as possible through credit cards. The card or mix of cards that will maximize your rewards is a function of how much you spend in various categories (e.g. gas, restaurants, groceries, etc.).

There is a free calculator tool at Credit Card Tune-Up: Maximize Your Cash Back Rewards that will calculate the best card or mix of cards for your spending profile.

Go Darwin!

November 1, 2006 by Anonymous, 2 years 35 weeks ago
Comment id: 15020

Capitalism relies on there being a certain number of suckers. My advice; DON’T BE A SUCKER! If you can’t pay off what you charge every month then using a credit card makes you a sucker.

Ads for Credit Cards

October 30, 2006 by Anonymous, 2 years 35 weeks ago
Comment id: 14996

What I find rather amusing is the fact that there are 8 Google supplied ads on this page. All 8 of which are for sites which allow you to apply for credit cards. There are also 4 small google search ads which also link to sites whilch will supply credit.

human nature again

October 29, 2006 by Anonymous, 2 years 35 weeks ago
Comment id: 14994

uncertainty avoidance and immediate gratification are two of the behaviors that cards take advantage of.... mental control panel | test center | games

All too egar

October 27, 2006 by Anonymous, 2 years 35 weeks ago
Comment id: 14988

I applied for an American Express Blue card online last year and after I filled everything out, it rejected my application because it said I made less than the minimum income per year. So I pressed the back button, changed my income to what it said was the minimum and Boom, I was approved. 2 weeks later I had a shiny new Blue card in the mail. Now, unlike most people, I am good with my finances and don't have crazy debt, and only needed this card to make a few purchases while I was short on cash. But the ease with which I was able to just change my income, to several thousand more than I actually make, and still receive the card is just irresponsible on the card issuer's behalf.

Post new comment



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.