About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here?
Let's talk.
The other half of the equation is
blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science,
please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our
Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.
In Michael Crighton's latest novel, 'State Of Fear', he weaves into his story enough factual data to produce the desired effect of getting the already skeptical silent majority of readers to realize that global warming is a big, fat hoax.
Yes, that's right - global warming is a fraud. If you're willing to suspend disbelief for a second, consider the following:
1) Most scientists do not believe human activities threaten to disrupt the Earth's climate. Many worry that it *might*, but those worries have less to do with fact and much more to do with belief.
2) The most reliable temperature data show no global warming trend. If our records from 1880 onward show global warming tied perfectly to CO2 emissions, then why did 1940-1970 see a linear decrease in global temperatures? The answer is, we don't know why, just as we can't say with *any* scientific certainty that global warming exists or is caused by humans.
3) Global computer models are too crude to predict future climate changes.
4) The IPCC did not prove that human activities are causing global warming.
5) A modest amount of global warming, should it occur, would be beneficial to the natural world and to human civilization.
6) Quickly reducing our greenhouse gas emissions would be costly and would not stop global warming.
7) The best strategy to pursue is one of "no regrets." [I say this on global warming, but a "no regrets" CO2 policy would be equally beneficial to deforestation]
If the topic is of interest to you, read the below pieces and let me know if you agree or disagree; either way I'll still love you, but do yourself and your readers a favor and don't presume that
a)the scientific community is in agreement on this issue; or
b)Bush is acting in anything other than a completely rational, responsible, informed way.
-Chris Zaharias
Here
Here
and
Here