Reply to comment
Anothr question that came to mind..
October 31, 2007 by MainFragger, 2 years 3 weeks ago
Comment id: 25751
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
If you had ideal cirumstances where you had a shuttle in space, and no other forces would effect th following experiment, would gas consumption follow pythagorean theorum? If you could burn exactly three thousand gallons going forward, and exactly four thousand gallons going up. Would you burn exactly 5,000 gallons finishing the hypotaneuse of the the triangle? Or is it not quite that efficient/accurate? What is the tolerance range of that test?