Reply to comment

I get it - women are superior in every way, and even where men are shown to have some advantage (bigger brains), the female authors use this against them. Anyone reading this, do a search on 'men women grey white cells' - we know since 2003 that men have 10 TIMES as many grey cells, responsible for concentrated thinking, while women have more white cells for interconnectivity. Thus women would seem to have a facility for multitasking. But a community of multitaskers would still be living in the Stone Age without the concentrated creativity of men. Creativity and mutitasking are two ends of a pole - but female writers and pseudoscience researchers leave out this most vital point - the incredible lack of creativity of these supposed master multitaskers. If you have creativity, you can invent a machine that multitasks more than a billion women put together. Now when women invent a better machine than us men, better multitasking computers and software, perhaps THEN they could risk opening their mouths to boast about dubious biological advantages. Be honest, the historical record of female creativity is embarrassing. Ignoring this, and trying to boost their own egos in such a dubious way, merely demonstrates a major inferiority complex.