Reply to comment
Study assumptions
July 5, 2005 by denschmitz, 4 years 18 weeks ago
Comment id: 1058
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Has anyone had luck finding the text of this study? I expect that buried in the details are some assumptions regarding production processes that may be inflating the costs, but without access to the study data, it's impossible to tell.
Regarding thermal depolymerization, the Wikipedia article has enough pointers to research the technique, and it's not clear that this study takes this into account.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_depolymerization