Reply to comment
"Regardless of Carbohydrate, Protein or Fat Content"
February 26, 2009
by Anonymous,
39 weeks 2 days ago
Comment: 34872
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
The conclusion of the title of this page is way off.
Where is the elements of the study with 10% carbs, or 5% carbs, or less ?
Weight loss (Atkins, Taubes, Montingnac, Banting, Mendosa) over the last 150 years is known to be easier and faster with carb restriction. Particularly high GI carbs.
The conclusion, and perhaps the skew in favor of "no difference" is designed to support the bankrupt AHA-lead hypothesis of of a carb heavy food pyramid, and the suggestion that cutting calories is the way to go.