Skip to main content

Reply to comment

Didn't miss the point

February 26, 2009 by madler, 39 weeks 3 days ago
Comment: 34868

The point was made quite clear: "The main finding from the trial was that diets with varying emphases on carbohydrate, fat and protein levels all achieved clinically meaningful weight loss and maintenance of weight loss over a two-year period." The study was to show that several different diets with the same caloric intake, but different ratios of carbs, fat, and protein all produced the same weight loss. How you get that they were comparing the caloric input of varying diets, I have no idea. The objective was to have the same caloric input for all of the diets, and only vary ratios of food types. One variable at a time, like any good study.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <sub> <blockquote> <br> <hspace> <img> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <width> <height> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.


Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes