Reply to comment
Really scary
December 18, 2008
by Anonymous,
48 weeks 6 days ago
Comment: 33434
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
It's bad enough this group of people are trying to severely limit a trace gas which is essential for plant life on earth, now they are cooking up wild schemes to play with the environment in ways which could cause far more damage than any supposed global warming. Why not just explode all the nuclear weapons and create a nuclear winter? Is that really a more outlandish statement than what you read in the article?
The article states global warming is getting worse faster than projections. How can that be when it has cooled since 1998? Didn't the projections say we'd be 1-2 degrees hotter by now if we didn't immediately curb CO2? Hmmm, CO2 has increased and the temperature has gone down.
Yes, the climate changes. It gets warmer, it gets colder. Should we spend trillions of dollars trying to make it stay the same all the time? Would it do any good? Right now I'd vote for making it warmer since it hasn't been much above 0 F around here for a couple of weeks.