Reply to comment
So the ever increasing
October 9, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 6 weeks ago
Comment id: 32329
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
So the ever increasing population doesn't descend into desparate poverty.
What else is going to put a check on the ever increasing population besides desperate poverty? It seems that the problem is not that there is not enough to go around, but that there is an uneven distribution of wealth. Increasing productivity and economic gain only mean that the people at the top will be able to engage in more and more decadent and superfluous luxuries.