Reply to comment
There can be no debate!
July 31, 2008
by Anonymous,
1 year 16 weeks ago
Comment: 31307
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Since I doubt Gadfly is your real name, you might as well post anonymously also. There is plenty of evidence out there that shows global warming isn't happening or isn't caused by CO2. However, we've been told over and over that the science part is done. There can be no debate. That my friend, is not science. Scientific theories are always open to debate. Especially as new data and theories come to light. I think it is time you respect the "science" and do some more research. The Nobel prize was an obvious political move, not a prize for Nobel type science.
Yes, I am a "denier" which is your semi clever phrasing for someone who doesn't believe that all the science has been done yet with regards to climate change.