About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Reply to Anonymous
The fact that the DT reaction is 100 times easier than the DD reactions is important.
The results of sonofusion experiments with DD reactions are actually contested because the signs of fusion reactions are very feeble. This lack of result induces a reduction of financial support for the sonofusion study.
If we could test the sonofusion with the DT reaction, the signs of reaction could be more visible and so the sonofusion study could regain financial support.
The test of sonofusion with DT reaction is not premature.