About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
True it may be the oldest cloning tree....Yet it is not the same tree no matter it's age...the pines in California are the same tree without and self cloning or reproduction through "rebirth" through base push or Root push.
Let us Clarify "Oldest Living Tree" as a single tree that does not clone itself through bark\base push or root growth,for if this is true the louisiana Privet a natorious root cloner has never died and continues to prolificate through root push...
Ok PEOPLES a TREE is a single organism that grows up and does not do base or root push...heck we got some cypresses that are 500-700 years old and they grow slow...LOL :o)