Science Blog

Science news straight from the source

Navigation

  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Animals
    • Anthro and Archaeology
    • Bio and Medicine
    • Brain and Behavior
    • Business and Economy
    • Computers and Electronics
    • Education and Outreach
    • Energy and Environment
    • Geoscience
    • Internet and Communication
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Nanotech, Chem and Materials
    • Physics and Numbers
    • Security and Defense
    • Software
    • Space
    • Transportation
  • Reader Blogs
  • Commerce
  • Register/Login
  • RSS
Home Money doesn't grow on trees, but gasoline might
  • Contact
  • Home
Google

Recent Comments

  • Maybe this will help
  • Typically one-sided sexist pseudoscience
  • rehbilitation technique
  • Inherently Flawed Theory
  • Your post is quite devoided too.
more

Reader Blogs

  • Spine-Relaxing Chairs Invented
  • City Council To Recognize Physics Students For Solving Stephen Hawking Mistake
  • Cystic Fibrosis – Axentis Pharma Initiates Clinical Trial for Lung Infections
  • Mysterious Disc Found
more

again, water's not fuel

Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 2008-04-09 21:24.

Basic science here guys. When you "burn" water, what are the waste products, hmmm? Are they, um, water? So let me see. I'm going to take water, do something magic to it--say split it into hydrogen and oxygen, and never mind where I get the energy to do that-- and then burn the hydrogen which combines with oxygen in the air to form water and release heat.

Yes, the hydrogen released from water can be burned (to form water again). Hydrogen really is the fuel and water is the product created when it is burned. Basic laws of thermo require that you cannot just make energy out of nothing. So you will never get more energy out of the hydrogen produced from water than what it took to create the hydrogen in the first place.

Water is not in any way possible a fuel. It never can be a source of fuel. Any device that uses a car battery / energy from the car's alternator (converts car's mechanical energy to electrical to recharge battery) will only be converting energy that originally came from the car's gasoline. Thus using such a system not only will not provide net energy in fuel, the conversion process cannot be 100% efficient due to thermodynamics laws and therefore will result in a loss of fuel economy.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Copyright, Science Blog.
Think. It's not illegal yet. Read our Privacy Policy.
RoopleTheme