Reply to comment

I too agree - but on different terms. They wrote about the study and, the study, which when viewed through your interpretation, is incorrect because there are multiple possibilities of the end result they got. I read your comments to mean they are attaching a higher cause/effect relationship than one should when dealing with people and their stated impressions.

This would seem to be an artifact of the study itself and the publishing venue that should have reviewed it - rather than the newspaper that reported on it.

Eric