Reply to comment
How should I do?
April 7, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 33 weeks ago
Comment id: 28649
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Re Halliday:
I do not want recall the bad exerience, e.g., a paper was published when the part against Einstein was deleted.
My urgent question is: how should I do?
I made a piece of software with real images. If it is right then Einstein is wrong. The point is that everyone can play the software and judge if it is right.
I would like to make the software to be free but I want to make profit of it for the reason you know.
But the critical problem is: will the Einstein camp be angry at me, and kill me if I make the software public?