Reply to comment
Re: Re5: David, Whitehead, meaning of the Hilbert-Einstein
February 28, 2008 by Halliday, 1 year 38 weeks ago
Comment id: 27828
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Christopher:
I'm not relying on your comments "instead". I'm only surmising from what you appear to be saying, since I haven't, yet, done the reading. (I'm not sure when I'll have the time to actually read their works, as opposed to some possible sources I have more readily available that may have touched upon some of this. I have work to do of a completely different nature that is becoming increasingly demanding, for the next month or so.)
My comments about "actual" vs. "effective" curvature and "interpretation" is simply a statement of a potential situation this issue may relate to. It's just a guess, based on the very limited, third hand information I have, right now. Nothing more or less.
I'm certainly not passing judgment based on such limited information. I'm sorry if I gave anyone any other impression.
David