Reply to comment
the ignored presidential science debate.
December 30, 2007
by jerry a. myers (not verified),
1 year 47 weeks ago
Comment: 26686
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
THERE is no presidential science oriented
debate with out the mention of the most
ignored issue in 2007, into 2008.
WITH the proven discoveries in atomic data
creating a new form of communications in
space/defense literally elevating the
mathematical world to universal levels of
informational technology beyond SUPER POWER
control, an new atomic supremacy is born.