Reply to comment
Al had it right...
May 21, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 24 weeks ago
Comment id: 30037
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
I think Al had it right, as far as he went. Same as Newton did as far as HE went.... Al just expanded on it... I just don't think its complete. There is more to be explained. There is a mistake/misjudgment somewhere. He came closer to the final answer but its not final yet. Why do we have to create other dimensions and reality's in order to explain things. Not to mention that time ?stops? at the speed of light? I cannot help but feel that is a mistake. Time is like God... unstoppable... time moves at a constant speed regardless of anything else. The fact that our measurement of it changes does NOT mean that time itself changes. once again I am a Layman...