About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here?
Let's talk.
The other half of the equation is
blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science,
please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our
Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.
I understand the point of a cingularity, but what you have to realize is that idea behind a cingularity is a human invention of thought and theory and does not necessarily exist.
If we assume singularities actually exist, then I might ammend my statement to say that time might cease to exist in our perceivable dimensions, but continues to exist in other dimensions that might not be directly affected by gravity. That way, we can explain that time might seem to stop from our point of view, but is still functioning somewhere.. It has to be that way, because otherwise singularities would be a catch-22..It needs time to exist at its locale, but its existance requires that time doesn't exist at that locale. That simply doesn't make sense to me.
If we assume singluarities don't exist, then we can simply claim that our relative perception of a certain area of space are not able to make sense at certain areas of space because the information in and around them never come back to be properly measured. Until we find a way of overcoming that, singularities are the sound of one hand clapping.
MainFragger