- Topics
- Aerospace
- Animals
- Anthro and Archaeology
- Bio and Medicine
- Brain and Behavior
- Business and Economy
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Outreach
- Energy and Environment
- Geoscience
- Humor
- Internet and Communication
- Media and Entertainment
- Nanotech, Chem and Materials
- Physics and Numbers
- Security and Defense
- Software
- Space
- Transportation
- Reader Blogs
- Commerce
- Register/Login
- RSS
About the singularity
Submitted by MainFragger on Sat, 2008-05-03 09:33.
I understand the point of a cingularity, but what you have to realize is that idea behind a cingularity is a human invention of thought and theory and does not necessarily exist.
If we assume singularities actually exist, then I might ammend my statement to say that time might cease to exist in our perceivable dimensions, but continues to exist in other dimensions that might not be directly affected by gravity. That way, we can explain that time might seem to stop from our point of view, but is still functioning somewhere.. It has to be that way, because otherwise singularities would be a catch-22..It needs time to exist at its locale, but its existance requires that time doesn't exist at that locale. That simply doesn't make sense to me.
If we assume singluarities don't exist, then we can simply claim that our relative perception of a certain area of space are not able to make sense at certain areas of space because the information in and around them never come back to be properly measured. Until we find a way of overcoming that, singularities are the sound of one hand clapping.
MainFragger

