Reply to comment
Further Research Needed
November 13, 2007 by johnbrandy, 1 year 51 weeks ago
Comment id: 25954
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
There are individuals that can allegedly "defeat" the polygraph test. Have they been tested with the (fMRI) to determine if this method is as reliable as noted. Until such test are performed, we cannot be sure that the (fMRI) imaging test is necessarily better, in all cases, than the traditional polygraph test. Moreover, "functional psychotics" individuals may truly believe their account of an incident, even if the facts are materially different. Therefore, would the intervention of (fMRI) have the capacity to discern potential "lies" in such cases?