Reply to comment

Yes Jake it confirms only sensitivity in the glans, which is what everyone is complaining about these "Studies". They don't account for the highly senstive bundle of nerves that is removed by circumcision, which Sorrells showed to contain the most sensitive areas. These reports would be more accurate if they added "In the Glans" to the headline. They aren't bad studies of the glans, but to make a claim on total sensitivity while ignoring the key difference of the groups you are studying, makes this "Junk Science"

1) Measured the glans
2) Measured 1 point on the glans "tested on the dorsal midline glans of the penis"
3) Measured 1 point on the glans"The patients were tested on the dorsal midline glans of the penis"
4) Measured 19 points including the glans AND The foreskin, you know the part that circumcision removes?
5) Measured 1 point on the glansand 1 point on the shaft and I heard one on the forearm?

Wheres the foreskin?