Reply to comment
I declare bullshit
July 28, 2007
by Anonymous (not verified),
2 years 18 weeks ago
Comment: 24371
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
WTF is the bias of these jerks? WTF were they looking at sensitivity of the glans when it is the foreskin itself that has the sensitivity important in sexual excitement? They missed the point [pardon the pun] entirely.
As one who was circumsised post-puberty [don't ask] and with some prior sexual experience, I declare unequivocal bullshit.
These "researchers" should be drummed out of science for life. Their pro-circumsision bias is unquestionable.