Skip to content

Reply to comment

Reply to Fred Bortz from Adrianne

July 25, 2007 by Adrianne (not verified), 2 years 15 weeks ago
Comment id: 24341

Fred,
Certainly! Climate is a very complex phenomenon, but for understanding the complex matter better, it might be very helpful to review an event that happened without the direct influence of the sun: the Arctic Warming in the late 1910s, respectively the Big Spitsbergen Warming in winter 1918/19, to which I gave a link in my previous comment: arctic warming theory. The first to wonder about this subject was B.J. Birkeland who stressed in his findings, back in 1930 (Met.ZeitS. 1930), that it could “probably be the greatest yet known on earth”. And H.W.Ahlmann, observing a rapid increase from 1918-1940, noted in: The Geographical Journal, 1946, that this part of the Arctic “may, without exaggeration, be said to have experienced a climatic revolution”. This “revolution” cannot have come from the sun, not from CO2, but only from the sea, as thoroughly explained in the given reference. After all, the temperatures ‘exploded’ during the winter season when no sun was shining.

Reply



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.