Reply to comment
I haven't got the chance to
July 17, 2007 by Adrianne (not verified), 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 24253
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
I haven't got the chance to read the article, but I am a bit surprised about the theme. As I know, the sun and the oceans are the two main factors that influence climate. If we accept the fact that the sun is just there and can't influence the climate in a big way, then the oceans may also be neutral towards the climate.
This would also mean that the arctic warming theory presented on that site is also bad and does not explain at all the 20th century climate. Still, the scale is too disporportionate to accept that human actions can influence the climate in such a way.