Reply to comment
Solar link to global warming ruled out
July 16, 2007 by Darren (not verified), 2 years 16 weeks ago
Comment id: 24244
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Interesting... yes, the SUNSPOT cycle is the average duration of the sunspot cycle is 11.1 years, but cycles as short as 9 years and as long as 14 years have been observed.
But what about.:
The 22 year magnetic cycle...
The Maunder cycle (400-odd years)...
What about precession of the earth....
What about cosmic rays vs. solar wind...
What about synergy when they all come together...
I think some Carbon traders want to make a quick buck before folks get smart...