Reply to comment
Too specialized for public usage.
April 24, 2007 by DuLac (not verified), 2 years 30 weeks ago
Comment id: 22109
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Basically this is an expansion of the programmable circuits used for decades by the NSA to crack ciphers. The news is that it allows an automatic programming of the circuits.
The result is that only very repetitive tasks are optimized in circuit programming. This works well with cipher cracking, war-weather-economic-social simulation/prediction that is been used for decades.
An U.S. general once said about the end of WW-II: The germans lost the War but the NoZIs won it! ... This is a better tool for them to do more efficiently what they have been done for the last 50 years. The military-industrial complex will appreciate!
To the public this tool is useless. So take your ideas out!
You won't need it. Period. It is not for you!
Cheers.