Skip to content

Reply to comment

Nonsense

March 24, 2007 by Anonymous, 2 years 33 weeks ago
Comment id: 19595

"Dawkin's contradition is criticizing educational institutions for avoiding teaching evolution, while not criticizing current public school systems for avoiding teaching intelligent design."

ID might sound like an alternative, but it's not; the only alternative to evolution is ignorance, plain and simple.

Criticizing public schools for not having enough options in science classes is ridiculous, because why would you want ID, alchemy or astrology taught in a *science* class?

Reply



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.