Skip to content

Reply to comment

Anonymous Wrong

November 6, 2006 by Anonymous, 3 years 2 weeks ago
Comment id: 15052

- No, Dawkins does not think Science will prove there is no god. Basic logic: you can't prove a negative proposition in the absence of complete knowledge. - He was not happy with the title of the series: he does NOT say religion is the root of all evil. Channel 4 wouldn't change it, the best he could do was get a question mark in the title (which is conveniently left out here). - as for the arguments about scientists etc... just go read the book? The classic example was Einstein, who used "God" in a pantheist non-Judeo-Christian sense, and spent the rest of his days fighting the way his name was used to justify religion. Yes, he did say that in so many words. - understanding of religion... nope, he's quite familiar with the way religion in England has enlightened theologists, and has had many rewarding discussions with Archbishops & Cardinals. Don't think he was quite ready for that Haggard character, though - now we know more about him, don't we? The book is far better and more complete than that short TV series, made over a year ago. Read it before bashing it, eh?

Reply



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.