Reply to comment
Dawkins faith
November 6, 2006 by Anonymous, 3 years 2 weeks ago
Comment id: 15049
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
It's ironic to hear Richard Dawkins disparage faith considering he 'believes' that science will prove there is no God. He has no proofs to back up this belief and yet he has mounted a one man campaign against a belief in God. He also makes the astonishing claim that religion discourages independent investigation of truth. Most of the great scientists in history have been religious so this misstatement is easily refuted. He really should go back to doing science and leave religion alone since he doesn't really understand or care to understand it. He is just taking today's headlines and exploiting them for his personal agenda.