Reply to comment
disagree
January 28, 2009 by Anonymous, 42 weeks 5 days ago
Comment id: 34062
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
I have used LSD and I found overall no lasting benefits. No great insights gain. It was fun, it was crazy, it was scary, and I was happy when I was finished. To put the idea out there that there is an effective way to clinically test LSD is ludicrous. It's hard enough to get perfect control groups to study OCD or DEPRESSION how in the hell could you possibly screen for LSD candidates and get a clean sample group. I just don't see it happening.