Reply to comment

What a shame you took the signature so seriously - maybe you could lighten up a little. That phrase was on the front of a tee-shirt my wife bought for me years ago, and has been a family catch-phrase (and running joke) ever since.

So putting that misunderstanding to one side.

Have you Googled any of the names I gave? (just wondering - oh I shouldn’t need to "wonder" if I'm psychic though should I?)

You say......

"ALLEGED REAL pictures is proof of “ABSOLUTELY NOTHING”!!"

So when one does a laboratory experiment. one records data. One has reliable independent expert witnesses, and one records outcomes as best as one can. So in the book I keep referring to (The Mediumship of Jack Webber by Harry Edwards), they go to extreme lengths to explain how the photographic plates were sealed by Kodak employees, the credentials of the witnesses. etc etc etc. These days one photo means nothing, in this the era of Photoshop, but in 1939 (when these photos were taken), Photoshop was not all that common. But the sworn affidavits from members of the police force, newspaper editors (etc) that were present at these sessions should account for something.

If you’re actually interested in the facts, not just telling everyone that you’re right and everyone else (that doesn’t agree with you) is wrong, why not do what I keep suggesting. Have a look at this one book. It contains a painstaking account of how these photos were obtained. It is what you would have to call, very good scientific method (particularly for the day).

And, should you decide to actually LOOK at the “evidence”, presented in this first book, then you may be interested in moving on through the rest of the list I provided.

Again I repeat, you asked for “proof”. In response I gave you the details of a reservoir of data just waiting for you to peruse, but you still choose to say it’s all B.S. before ACTUALLY LOOKING AT THE FACTS. Not good science!!

You berate me for not bringing something “real”, to this discussion.

Well I beg to differ. I have, but so far you have chosen to not bother actually looking at it.

And sentences like …. “But deep down you know that don’t you? coos you’re clever, aint ya?”. Don’t really display a desire for a friendly open exchange of information. (As I assumed this blog was all about). So far I offer information, and you make snide personal attacks in response. We don’t seem to be getting very far do we?

Ho Hum.

Soundthinker

Oh and for the record – the following automatic signature is intended as HUMOUR…….

"you're just jealous coz you can't hear the voices"